City to consider raising water rates
Print- •
- •
-
10 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •
Victoria homeowners trying to keep their lawns green during the drought might be reeling from large water bills this month.
But a recent state survey indicates the city’s water and sewer rates compare well to 13 other Texas cities.
“I would say that right now we’re in about the middle of those 14 cities surveyed,” said Lynn Short, Victoria’s public works director.
The survey was conducted by the Texas Municipal League comparing water and sewer rates for water use of 5,000 and 10,000 gallons for residential customers. Victoria was grouped with cities in the 50,000 to 75,000 population.
A Victoria customer using 10,000 gallons would pay $29.77 for the water. The average for the 15 cities is just under $36.
That same Victoria customer would pay $38.14 for sewer, which compares to the average of just over $36.
That information will be presented to the city council when it meets today.
Short also plans to present the council with a plan to increase the total water and sewer bill by $1.91 a month by about 2010. That income will be used to replace deteriorating water and sewer lines in downtown Victoria and under Sam Houston Drive when it is rebuilt.
Those increases would apply to the base rate, which includes the first 2,000 gallons of water use. The staff also is recommending increasing rates 10 cents for each 1,000 gallons used above the base rate.
Council Member Paul Polasek said he’s still reviewing the numbers. But he said he personally doesn’t have a problem with the current rates charged by the city.
“We need to make sure when people turn the tap on that the water is clean and useable,” he said. “We take it for granted, including myself.”
Keeping quality water flowing to customers requires upkeep of the system and the proposed increases will help pay for those improvements, he said.
Print- •
- •
-
10 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •


Comments
They need to raise water rates in order to pay for their legal defense.
July 2, 2008 at 8:20 a.m.Anyone else notice that last year, during record rainfall our so-called leadership said not one word about water rates. Then comes a dry year, and these crooked SOBs can't find an excuse quick enough to jump rates.
I honestly think our elected officials are too stupid to be the lead on these types of things (see indicted Mayor Armstrong exhibit one), but there petty power hungry bureaucrats are driving (exhibit two, former city attorney/investigator Smith, Houston reject fire cheif Ure, henceman Buentello) this EXPANSION OF GOVERNMENT BUDGETS AND POWER to benefit their theifdoms.
Of course, just my opinion.
July 1, 2008 at 10:24 p.m.While I agree this may not the best time to increase rates, for that matter is there ever? There are many old lines, including the downtown area, that have needed replacement for decades and for years their replacement have been put off. We are going to have to bit the bullet, pay the cost and keep our infrastructure maintained and current.
July 1, 2008 at 7:39 p.m.NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO BE HIKING THE WATER RATES.
July 1, 2008 at 10:37 a.m.It would be interesting to see the as-built drawings of the city water distribution system. As cities grow water lines are not always connected in a loop. For cost reasons many times there is line installed to pick up an area without making a loop back into the system. I would imagine in a city as old as Victoria with as much growth as it has there are many Dead-end runs in the water system. It is common in all cities.
July 1, 2008 at 10:29 a.m.The water will only originate from a few locations, I am not familiar enough with Victoria to know how many, if it is good at the origin and the system is sealed, no back feed, then what could and likely is, going on is the chlorine content is dropping due to stagnate (setting still) water in the system.
No dead-end line. We live in a large, relatively new, subdivision. Managers from the utilities dept. have just said they are several of these devices scattered throughout town to bleed the poor water out of the city water system. Never mind that they are destroying the asphalt where the water is gushing out :/
July 1, 2008 at 10:05 a.m.My Mother used to say if Johnny jumps off a cliff are you going to follow him? Cities that compare the cost of services to other cities as justification of rates are simply lazy. The proper rate for services is exact cost, no profit, and certainly not what another city is charging.
July 1, 2008 at 9:05 a.m.You might be on a Dead-end run of a large water line. If that is the case and there are not enough users to rotate the water in the line often enough, the line has to be flushed regularly to prevent health hazards.
A rate increase in water? I am not so sure about this one. Can we just call it a tax hike instead? I do not think that the value of water has increased as such it warrants a "rate" increase.
I like Lynn a lot and think we are lucky to have him working for the city. However I would have to question him on the logic of the increase for two reasons. First, my neighborhood has a fire hydrant with a mechanism on it that opens up the hydrant everynight and drains water until the morning. Many thousands of gallons of water by now I am guessing and it has been idicated by his department that it may be on there indefinately due to poor water quality in our "area". Second, if we are going to compare our water rates to what other cities are charging, we should do the same for our fire fighters and police and get them the salaries they deserve. Another argument imo that other people besides the city managers and dept heads should get raises based on pay-for-performance.
July 1, 2008 at 8:47 a.m.That is a lot for water. But buying it from a private system is different from a City.
A City should only charge exact costs of the service it provides. The Government is not a for profit business. So it should be cheaper.
I think we have the same garbage service.
July 1, 2008 at 7:17 a.m.I know that a lot of the city's water customers are going to be upset if the rates are increased... however, before you start consider yourselves lucky! I live in an area where we have a private water company and I'd gladly trade my LOWEST bill with your HIGHEST bill on any given day! I received my most recent bill just a few days ago. I don't water, I don't have a pool, spa, or a leak.... I have a small family and don't really do more than your average amount of laundry.... My base rate, water and sewage only, usually runs about $120.00 monthly. In February, my bill was nearly $300.00. I pay a seperate bill for garbage collection. That bill is around $30.00 a month for once a week pick up! Consider yourselves lucky!
July 1, 2008 at 7:02 a.m.