Petitioners to Goliad County: Stop UEC legal fight
Print- •
- •
-
14 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •
Monday meetingWhen: 9 a.m., Monday
Where: The first-floor courtroom inside the Goliad County Courthouse. Commissioner Jerry Rodriguez said he will discuss the petition during the meeting.
GOLIAD - A 281-signature petition failed to sway commissioners who vow to continue a costly legal fight against uranium mining.
The fight to protect groundwater is worth every penny, and the petition is suspect at best, those Goliad County commissioners say.
Petitioners, though, say enough is enough. They call for the county's battle against Uranium Energy Corp. to end.
"Stop using vast sums of tax money on legal actions that result in the loss of private property rights and economic development," the petition notes.
Betty Jacob, a 78-year-old longtime Goliad resident, presented the petition to the court.
"Hopefully, it will encourage people to come forward to voice their opinions," Jacob said. "At some future time, perhaps the judge and the commissioners see this is not what most in the community want."
Goliad County sued Uranium Energy Corp. in March 2008. The county claims the company contaminated well water when it failed to properly plug many of its 1,100 exploratory wells. Both sides say science supports their arguments.
At first, all five commissioners court members agreed to sue. Jerry Rodriguez was among two of five court members who voted in May to stop the fight.
"The petition shows not everybody was against mining like they were led to believe," Rodriguez said. "The petitioners don't want us spending any more money on this."
The county spent $350,000 so far on legal costs, including money used toward a federal case tossed by a judge in recent months. To continue the fight, the court will vote in coming weeks to appropriate another $200,000 for near-future expenses.
That decision may hinge on whether a judge awards the uranium company $200,000 for reimbursed fees linked to the tossed federal case.
"If all that happens, I'm worried we'll either have to borrow the money or increase the tax rate," Rodriguez said.
Commissioner Ted Long supports the legal fight.
"I see this as the most important issue in Goliad County's history," Long said. "If they get a mine permit and get started, it'll spread like cancer. There are other areas in the county and surrounding counties they want to do this in. I intend to fight them until hell won't have it."
Long analyzed the petition. Of the 281 signatures, Long found:
207 petitioners failed to list an address or legible signature.
40 petitioners listed Goliad addresses.
3 people with out-of-town address claimed to be Goliad County taxpayers.
The addresses given ranged from as close as Goliad and Victoria, to as far away as LaWard and Rockport.
Commissioner Jim Kreneck said these findings indicate the petition is invalid.
"Even if every signature was valid, 281 people are only about 4 percent of the county's population," Kreneck said. "I say the fight is necessary to ensure the quality of our drinking water for all the citizens of Goliad County. I don't even consider the petition."
Melvin Klotzman is a petitioner who lives in Victoria County. The 78-year-old business owner said he pays Goliad County taxes on profits earned via oil and gas interests.
"I think their intentions were good, but I don't think the commissioners and the judge properly polled all the people in the county," Klotzman said. "I think most are in favor of uranium mining and of stopping the fight. It's just too expensive and there are state agencies that can take care of their problems at no cost."
In January, the county will present its case during a state hearing - the next step in the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality's process to contest mining permits.
If commissioners vote to appropriate $200,000 more for legal expenses, the money will go to lawyers and other experts.
Petitioners urge commissioners to keep the money in the county.
"We ask and demand local elected officials to work with industry to create jobs and a stronger tax base," the petition notes. "We have had enough."
Print- •
- •
-
14 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •



Comments
"Manuel Longoria vs. URI where Mr. Longoria accused URI of dumping all kinds of radwaste on top of and underneath his property. Cause number 16264, filed August 25, 1995. Look it up."
So, can you name an aquifer and local economy that was destroyed as a result of such an uranium mining incident? That was the challenge.
August 28, 2009 at 12:54 p.m.The brave are those commissioners and judge who put the interests of the community above corporate interest, and voted to continue the fight against Uranium Energy Corp. Imagine if you had in your foxhole the flip flop commissioners who gave in and and sold out by changing their vote. UEC apparently got to the two commissioners who voted to stop the legal battle. Commissioner Long has it right "If they get a mine permit and get started, it'll spread like cancer."
August 26, 2009 at 9:51 a.m.Geez some of you are missing the point that we don't want to see IF the aquifer gets contaminated. We live here and this is a serious threat to our way of life. We have the right to protest this potential threat and to do our best to get rid of the threat. I think some of you would feel very different if this issue affected your family and your way of life.
August 26, 2009 at 9:29 a.m.Thank you brave commissioners. "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
August 26, 2009 at 7:30 a.m.Capt. John Parker to the Minutemen at Lexington
Manuel Longoria vs. URI where Mr. Longoria accused URI of dumping all kinds of radwaste on top of and underneath his property. Cause number 16264, filed August 25, 1995. Look it up.
August 26, 2009 at 5:31 a.m."Uranium mining will have the unintended consequence of contaminating our ground water and destroying our economy."
Can anyone give me a single example, from all the uranium mining that has gone on in Texas, where this has occurred? Do you know how many uranium mines are in Texas? There have been 110, according to this EPA database (http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/tenorm/pu...).
Please name the aquifer that was destroyed, the uranium mine responsible, and the local economy that went with it.
August 25, 2009 at 1:48 p.m.Give a hoot! Don't pollute! Uranium mining will have the unintended consequence of contaminating our ground water and destroying our economy. When the aquifer is ruined, the uranium company will slip out of town in the middle of the night, leaving their billions of dollars of liability.
August 21, 2009 at 8:02 a.m.MSRB - CONCUR!!! I'm still laughing, But so true!!
August 21, 2009 at 7:01 a.m.wish I had a copy of this petition to hang in my outhouse next to my sears catalog
August 21, 2009 at 1:25 a.m.If you expect that this mining could not affect your drinking water, then go ahead and agree to it. Don't come crying later when your swimming pool is full of iron bacteria and your grandchildren are drinking radionuclides. You asked for it! You got it!!
August 20, 2009 at 8:44 p.m.I'd like to address something. UEC states in their "investors' presentation" that "Texas is an 'agreement state'. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality issues the mining permit. No Federal approvals are necessary."
This is not entirely correct. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region VI must grant an "aquifer exemption" for the mining to occur. Though this is usually granted upon the recommendation of TCEQ, I don't believe this will be the case with the Goliad situation. EPA is reading this response, as they have read everything I've written as well as the comments from other concerned folks. We're the first group of people to have a good baseline prior to the mining so if something does happen to our water, we will point our fingers at EPA as well as TCEQ and the mining company.
Neither TCEQ nor EPA have ever had this in front of them before, so will EPA grant the aquifer exemption?
They say Texas is a "Fast-Track Permitting State", kind of like a scaled-down version of a college class where the professor tells you the answers to the final exam the day before. How embarrassing.
I used to be proud to call myself a Texan. Oh well.
August 20, 2009 at 5:18 p.m.Gee I wonder how much tax base the commissioners will have to work with if there is no usable DRINKING WATER in a large portion of the county. Where will UEC be then?
August 20, 2009 at 3:37 p.m.Has anyone actually said or written how much tax base these folks will provide? How many jobs? Will they be from Goliad? What pay scale?
The petition seems like a cheap and unsophisticated shot by people of the same ilk. Glad it was debunked.
The whole thing is about money. Some people are willing to sell out everybody else in the county for the almighty dollar. They justify it with "good for the local economy" and "help employ the locals" and "I can do what I want with my land" but if they cared one whit about the survival of Goliad County and its people, they would be fighting against uranium mining with the rest of us.
There have been people living here for centuries now and a mistake/contamination of the aquifer by one company could change everything.
For the sake of the almighty dollar.
Shameful.
August 20, 2009 at 8:53 a.m.Funny how it always comes down to money. Problem is you can't buy an aquifer. The State has to give it to you or save it for you, one or the other.
Thirty one applications have been made in Texas to mine uranium, and 31 permits have been granted historically. Doesn't this seem a little odd? If everybody in school got A's in class, wouldn't you smell a rat?
I particularly like the disclosures on the company's website, including "risks inherent in exploration activities" and "unexpected geological and hydrological conditions". That pretty much sums it up.
August 20, 2009 at 7:24 a.m.