An urgent New Year's request
Print- •
- •
-
4 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •
Since new year is upon us, I have considered a number of requests that I might make to my readers. These have included everything from personal savings to saving the planet. And in spite of our economic situation that extends far beyond our own household, city, state and country, my most urgent concern is the preservation of our natural environment. Most naturalist-type folks agree that we are losing much of our natural environment because of habitat loss that includes the majority of the plants and animals that live there. Those losses mostly are the result of poorly planned developments, excessive use of biocides and the careless introduction of exotic species.
An amazing number of folks respond to that concern by asking "What's all the fuss? So we lose a few wild animals or even a few species?" Well, first and foremost, human beings are part of nature, no matter how well we detach ourselves. We live in a world in which everything, at least in some subtle way, is interconnected to everything else. Like the strands of a giant web, a weakened or broken strand will continue to decline in strength and usability. Mankind is part of the matrix, not apart from it. Our long-term existence depends upon a healthy, viable environment. "Whatever you do to the least of my brothers, you do unto me."
Our most threatened natural resources include our freshwater streams, ponds and lakes, bays and estuaries, prairies and our forests. Tropical forests are at greatest risk because they contain the highest diversity of plants and animals known to mankind, many of which have not even been identified, and some of those may eventually be the solution to the prevention of the common cold and cancer. But it is projected that we will lose between 5 and 15 percent of the world's species by 2020, approximately 50 to 120 species per day. It has been estimated that of the world's bird species are declining in population or threatened with extinction. About 1,000 bird species (more than 11 percent) are at risk of extinction, while about 70 percent or 6,300 species are in decline. For instance, duck populations in the prairie pothole regions of the central U.S. and southern Canada have dropped more than 30 percent since 1955.
Frogs and salamanders are even more susceptible to pollution, and they too are declining worldwide. These amphibians, as well as many of our declining Neotropical migrant birds, are like the proverbial canary in the mine. Their declines are a warning that something is dreadfully wrong. But like the accelerating rate of cancer in the human population, we allow lobbyists and advertisers to blind us about the real causes. And America's Endangered Species Act is so under attack that its value for protecting the myriad of declining species, including those that are part of our most important warning system, is likely to come under the influence of those who care more about the value of the dollar than they do about their own children's health and survival. If present trends continue, we can expect an annual rate of loss as high as 50,000 species by the year 2020.
The fundamental need as we enter a new year with a new administration in Washington, is to speak out in support of our natural resources. We must not let the recent decay of our environmental laws and regulations continue. It is time we as a carrying people speak out in support of our native plants and animals.
It was Theodore Roosevelt who wrote: "The conservation of our natural resources and their proper use constitute the fundamental problem which underlies almost every other problem of our national life." And William Hornaday wrote: "The wild things of this earth are not ours to do with as we please. They have been given to us in trust, and we must account for them to the generations which will come after us and audit our accounts." And finally: "Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees." Revelations 7:3.
Ro Wauer writes about nature for the Victoria Advocate. Contact him in care of Victoria Advocate, P.O. Box 1518, Victoria, TX 77902.
Print- •
- •
-
4 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •


Comments
I agree we should be good stewards.
But a truth needs to be on both sides.
The Endangered Species Act is being missused at times. There are species that have been recovered and need to be taken off the list due to new laws and regulations that have solved the problem.
Polar Bears have been put needlessly on a protected list. They have greatly increased in numbers since the 60's contrary to what the WWF has stated. The push to put them on the endangered list is to stop the use of natural resources for fuel and such, it has nothing to do with a decrease in numbers.
Things like that are what I speak of. The Sierra Club and World Wildlife Foundation have become more about money and activists than truth in recent decades.
Like some "groups", they start off doing so much good but get taken over by mainly closed minded agenda driven people and groups. Truth will get problems solved with a largely bipartisan backing much quicker and easier than activists agendas.
January 11, 2009 at 12:48 a.m.I'm gonna let the Bible verse thing slide but....
We've lost - and discovered - hundreds of species over the minimal time humans have roamed the earth. Thousands of species have become extinct from nature's realm and as Ro states, we're a part of nature. Our time too, will come. As much as we'd like to think differently, our species will become extinct at some point as well. I doubt the cockroaches remaining to see our demise will establish a "Save the Humans" fund.
I worry too, though about human encroachment on nature. While we're a part of nature, the effort to remove ourselves from it; our homes, our transportation systems, our clothes, practically everything we adopt to make our lives more comfortable and convenient; destroy the natural habitat and so leave less room for those species who live within nature, not apart from it.
Perhaps we should combine this thread with another to find that ever elusive happy medium. If we stop teen pregnancy and ease up considerably in all the other age groups maybe we can stop squatting on all the good spots and let the ducks, frogs, salamanders, fruit flies, snail darters and polar bears have a few places to call their own.
Ernie
January 10, 2009 at 10:57 p.m.Using Bible verses out of context,,I like that,,well said Arlene....What gets me about how the Bible is so wrongly taught in todays society..Such as Three wise men,,,who said that there were Three?...And the Christ Mass tree,,,where did that come from?......And December the 25th,,,,where is its stated that, that is when Christ was born?....I'd love to see the Truth being taught,,but will it ever happen?..Many should take time to study their traditions,,before they observe them...Out of context.
January 10, 2009 at 10:39 p.m.What Are these Preachers Teaching?
And Why are they taking money for spreading the word?
Just wanted to comment.
Using Bible verses out of context to try to make a point is an ever-popular pastime, but Ro Wauer wins the prize for most outrageous. He quotes half of Rev. 7:3, conveniently leaving out the last half of the verse which says till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.
January 10, 2009 at 5:18 p.m.The context is that God is going to send out his angels to destroy most of the earth, but he tells them to wait until he puts a mark on his people which are obedient to him. Those who are marked or sealed will be spared the plagues.
Then in chapters eight, nine and ten of Revelation is a description of how God will burn up a third part of the trees, and all the grass, and kill 1/3 of all the creatures in the sea. And thats just a small part of the plagues described in the book of Revelation.
In fact, the Bible says that eventually the whole heavens and earth will be burned up, and new ones will be created. The point is that we are to worship the Creator, not the creation.
There are verses that show that humans are to be good stewards of the planet. Gen. 2:15 comes to mind. But if you are looking for a green God, best look elsewhere than Rev. 7:3.