City considers sidewalk design

Downtown project estimate cost $325,300

  • Print
  • 1 Comment
  • Favorite
  • Report an error Report error
    • Thank you for your submission.
      Error report or correction
      Contact name (optional) Contact phone/e-mail (optional)  
      Sending report
    • Close

The Victoria City Council is poised Tuesday to spend $325,300 on a project that may never happen.

It will consider awarding a contract for that amount for the design and engineering of the controversial proposed downtown sidewalk project.

"Who spends $325,300 on a project they're not certain they want to move forward with?" Council Member David Hagan asked. "That would be ridiculous."

The proposal would provide the council with a better idea of what can be done and with a more accurate cost estimate, council member Jim Wyatt said.

"It would be very difficult for me to make a decision until I see the design and cost estimates," Wyatt said.

City staff has presented the council with sidewalk improvement options ranging in cost from $2.6 million to $4.5 million. The work would be done in conjunction with a downtown utility replacement project that will result in streets and sidewalks being damaged.

The project would cover a five-block section of Main Street between Commercial and Juan Linn streets. It would also cover sections of Forest, Constitution and Bridge streets surrounding De Leon Plaza.

The contract amount would also pay the consultant, Urban Engineering of Victoria, for overseeing both the bidding process and the sidewalk construction, Lynn Short, the city's public works director, said.

"If we don't move forward with the actual construction, then we don't pay for those services," he said. "All the council has done is authorize the design."

Wyatt said he's heard from people both for and against the sidewalk project, which includes removing the old sidewalks, curbs and gutters and possibly replacing them with colored, textured or grooved sidewalks. Brick pavers could be installed at crosswalks and as accents on sidewalks.

"The basic comments I've heard is we have other streets and other necessities that should come before spending those dollars on sidewalks for downtown," Wyatt said. "On the other hand, I talked to other leaders and they say that it makes good sense while we're tearing up the utilities downtown to do it."

Hagan will vote against awarding the design contract, he said.

"We're in an economic downturn, and it's predicted to get worse," he said. "We shouldn't do any project right now that is not absolutely critical."

Hagan doesn't oppose improving downtown sidewalks, but it's a matter of priority and timing, he said.

  • If you go

    The city council meeting will begin at 5 p.m. Tuesday in the Council Chamber at 107 W. Juan Linn St.



  • Print
  • 1 Comment
  • Favorite
  • Report an error Report error
    • Thank you for your submission.
      Error report or correction
      Contact name (optional) Contact phone/e-mail (optional)  
      Sending report
    • Close

Comments

  • Why do we need to spend $325,000 dollars on a project that may never be completed? At this point in time with the economy the way it is, it would be prudent to hold off work on an elective project. The $2.6-4.6 million dollars is certainly a nice chunk of change that could be put to use on other more important projects. Our downtown is fine; a face lift would be nice but not necessary. However if the current city council deems this project “necessary”, do we not have a staff of engineers and inspectors that could not only design but oversee the completion of a project and are employed to evaluate and critique projects submitted to them that will be built by private individuals? Why do we have a staff of “professionals.” Oh that means that might have to actually work. If the people who are suppose to know all the guidelines and rules cannot handle this type of project they should not be employed in their current capacity. Goodness is only sidewalks. Some projects could be handled in house. It sure would be nice to see our tax dollars at work doing something productive.

    January 20, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.