Pro: Sidewalks make sense with work already planned
Print- •
- •
-
8 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •
When restaurant owner Maggie Kuykendall looks out the window of her downtown Taqueria Victoria, she cant help but see the unattractive sidewalks.
Our part of the sidewalk is really bad, she said. Its time for improvement.
The sidewalks along that portion of Main Street are cracked and uneven, making them a hazard, she said. Weeds are growing through the cracks. Replacing the sidewalks with something more attractive when the city replaces the utilities just makes sense to her.
I think it would be a horrible mistake for them to decide to redo the sidewalks a couple years down the road after they finish all the streets, Kuykendall said. Then its going to hurt the businesses again.
Realtor Louise Hull Patillo and husband Dennis Patillo live in and own commercial property downtown. She has no problem rattling off a list of reasons the city needs to improve the sidewalks.
We are spending $40 million-plus on infrastructure that will be covered up with either patchwork cement or asphalt, she said. It would seem quite logical that we would do something that would be an economic benefit to the city.
A million dollars is a lot of money to her, but the sidewalk project cost compared to the $40 million utility project isnt that much, she said.
I know there is controversy about this not being the time to spend money on any optional projects, she said. But because of the infrastructure work thats being done, it is the most opportune time for us to beautify and improve our downtown.
The city hasnt decided how the project would be paid for, but Patillo said the downtown residential and commercial property owners pay taxes. She said she doesnt see anything wrong with them getting a return on that investment.
I think its inaccurately titled as the sidewalk project because its so much more than that, Patillo said. If individuals would take the time to see the PowerPoint presentation of the recommendations being made, I think they would see it is a reasonable solution.
Mayor Will Armstrong said the more than 2,000 people who work downtown five days a week would benefit from the sidewalk improvements.
The sidewalks are already in poor condition and it will be necessary to cut and patch the sidewalks during the utility project, aggravating the situation.
Even cutting and patching costs money, Armstrong said. It would be better to spend more money now and do it right.
Its also appropriate to invest in the downtown area because it produces some of the citys highest property tax income per square foot, he said.
Print- •
- •
-
8 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •


Comments
True - exactly what education policies are to going to blame the city council for? A closer look at how schools operate in Texas would show that the school board, VISD, is responsible for our schools and those board members are independently elected, not appointed by the city.
January 27, 2009 at 5:39 p.m."those business owners are already paying for the work through their taxes"
Then those business owners should get the same thing that regular tax payers get for a sidewalk in front of their house,....plain old concrete.
January 27, 2009 at 1:57 p.m.If they want pavers or such to improve the value of their business property then they should pay for the upgrade and have it done at THEIR OWN expense.
I guess the next thing will to build a homeless shelter with showers and restrooms next to the bandstand on DeLeon Plaza (see the Library's complaints on their board).
January 27, 2009 at 9:46 a.m.those business owners are already paying for the work through their taxes
January 27, 2009 at 9:08 a.m.A real estate agent is in favor of upgrading their property at tax payer expense? Wow! What a surprise!
January 26, 2009 at 11:29 p.m.I think the city council needs to better explain to the public what is going to be involved with this project. From one of the council meetings I viewed when the project was presented it was said the sidewalk work could not begin until the utility work was completed. The utility work is estimated at 10 months and the sidewalk construction at 18 months. Either the presenter of the project was mis-understood or the some on the council are "spinning" the reality of this. The paper quoted a council member as stating it makes no sense to patch the sidewalks when they can be replaced for $4MM. I think the reality is the sidewalks will be "patched" during the utility construction and then torn out again for the actual sidewalk construction. I just don't see multiple cuts in the sidewalks being left open or with temporary covers for over 20 months. I wonder how many businesses downtown can weather 28 months of continuous construction?
January 26, 2009 at 6:26 p.m.It appears that some on Council do have vision. It does make sense to do this project now, not later as Mr. Hagan suggests. Why tear everything up and then just patch it back? Let's do it right and do it now.
January 26, 2009 at 5:38 p.m.If the city is going to improve the infrastructure , then they need to do it right and make it look some what attractive , I hope the city fathers arent like the city fathers of Corpus Christi, Texas.
January 26, 2009 at 3:54 p.m.Just take a walk downtown Corpus its look like a third world country.
Please dont be like that poor miserable city.
You only get one shot at this so dont be apologetic, or regretful of making the wrong decision.
Victoria is a very charming city to be small-mined or insignificant.
We need for our leaders to have VISION.