Victoria could get $6 million water park
Print- •
- •
-
52 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •
OTHER AGENDA ITEM
The city council will also receive a report from Doug Cochran, director of parks and recreation, about plans for Riverside Stadium.
He declined to be more specific, but said it would deal with operation and maintenance of ...
- SHOW ALL »
OTHER AGENDA ITEM
The city council will also receive a report from Doug Cochran, director of parks and recreation, about plans for Riverside Stadium.
He declined to be more specific, but said it would deal with operation and maintenance of the historic stadium.
If you go
The Victoria City Council will meet at 5 p.m. Tuesday at 107 W. Juan Linn St.
Victoria could be home to a $6-million, 3.2-acre water park if the developers are able to get the city to agree to a financial incentive package.
The developers will pitch their proposal to the city council at its meeting Tuesday, council member Gabriel Soliz said Thursday.
"They've met with us individually to let us know what's going on out there," he said. "I think it's a good idea."
Homer Escalante, the owner of Riverside Convention Center, said he is working with partners Keith and Davina Staff of Victoria to develop the project.
It would be on property next to the convention center on Red River Street near the entrance to Riverside Park. Escalante said he is also looking into locating the park at Cuero and Goliad, depending on which city offers the best incentives.
"We're hoping we will be able to break ground pretty quick," he said. "We want to push for Memorial Day opening."
The first phase of the park would include a lazy river, two children's sections, four slides and a wave pool. It would be similar to the water park in Sheridan, but two to three times the size, Escalante said.
It would employ from 60 to 80 people, including 20 to 30 permanently. The park could accommodate up to 2,000 people and would probably be open about 100 days during the summer.
But Phase 2 of the project would include a miniature golf course, go-karts, batting cage and possibly a paint-ball course and bumper boats. Construction on that $2 million to $3 million project would begin about mid-summer and it would be open all year.
"We've got the plans," Escalante said. "We're ready to roll."
But it all hinges on which city offers the best financial incentives, he said. Those could include anything from tax abatements to some sort of payment from the sales tax.
Soliz said he's not sure yet what type of assistance Victoria might be able to offer, if any.
"That right now is still up in the air," he said. "I think it's still necessary for us to sit down and discuss it as a group."
Print- •
- •
-
52 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •


Comments
Yes,let Cuero or Goliad have it!!
I am native Victorian 64 yrs.
THERE IS NOTHING FUN HERE AND HAS NEVER BEEN
ANYTHING FUN HERE,
that is why I TOOK MY GRANDCHILDREN to GOLIAD yesterday, went to garage sales, and to the wonderful
childrens park there!
We go to New Braunfels, San Marcos,San Antonio,
etc TO HAVE FUN!
We do that today, and my grandchildren of Victoria will do that the next generation, because
I do not expect to see any really great changes
in Victoria, it seems like the inspirational individuals are in other towns!
CLEAN UP THE RIVER, it is wonderful for tubing! My entire family has tubed the river.
Hopefully the Water Park will make it here,
October 4, 2009 at 7:26 a.m.what a change that might be!!!
I think a waterpark (if operated properly) would be a great asset financially for the city and it's residents. It would offer jobs and bring more revenue to the city from outside sources. Yes, it would mean a possible increase in crime do to an influx of people visiting from other locations, but isn't that why we have one of the highest ratios of law enforcement to civilians in the state of Texas? Lets use them. It's about time we stop practicing "Good 'ol boy if it ain't benefitting me I don't want it politics" and do something that will actually help the city grow in a positive direction.
October 3, 2009 at 3:11 p.m.It would have to be at a better location for sure. A drag strip would be way better for the city!
October 3, 2009 at 11:03 a.m.n45BA,
Two years away? With the new route of the parade, I predict it will be this year.
October 3, 2009 at 8:35 a.m.I see that a lot of you are saying parents do not control their kids in Victoria. This is mentioned multiple times in this comment area and several others. OK let me speak up for the parents. FIRST OFF MY KIDS ARE GROWN MATURE PRODUCTIVE CITIZENS BEFORE YOU START IN ON ME. Ok now for the defense of these parents. The laws today have changed parenting for the worse. You can not spank your child or your abusing them, you can not scream and yell at your child or your abusing them, you can not keep things from them or your depriving them and that is abuse, you can not work them until they break a sweat because your breaking child labor laws and that is abuse. These kids are taught in school that to turn their parents in if they get smacked. Basically society is why these kids are bad. In my day if I did wrong mom, dad, grandma, grandpa, uncles, aunts, the neighbors and anyone else busted my butt if I did wrong. Guess what I thought twice before I did anything. If I bad mouthed I got soap in my mouth or popped across the face so guess what I did not bad mouth. If I broke the rules I worked from sun up to sun down with my parents on my rear the whole time. So I did not break the rules. We practiced religion in the schools and we said our national anthem every day. We were taught respect, pride, courage and fear. Yes fear the most important one of all. Fear what is going to happen to your a.. if you messed up. The kids today are taught disrespect, discouragement, hate and no pride. I raised my kids old school and guess what they never broke the law or spent one night in jail. They graduated school and learned a trade and are hard working self supporting me. OLD SCHOOL WORKS!
October 2, 2009 at 11:44 p.m.I think this is a great idea but there is no way that the juvenile delinquents that run the streets of Victoria will keep this place nice. If you have walked the new walking trail then you have seen the graffiti. It is really sad. Victoria has too many parent's that do not control their children or teach them how to respect other peoples property. I wish I didn't sound so negative but I am sure in a years time something will happen concerning the water park. There are too many parent's that let their kids run the streets at all hours of the night. These are the parent's that have no control over their kids. Those are the kids that burglarize homes & buisness. It's sad to say those same kids will be the ones to break into the water park, vandalize it & destroy it. This isn't fair to the kids in our community that are deserving of this.
October 2, 2009 at 10:45 p.m.roberttx: "the red river entrance to riverside park is an embarrasment"
Very true, but the entire Riverside Park, sans golf course, and baseball stadium is an eyesore. The last drive I took through the park, I was shocked by the decay that has been allowed to permeate unabated. Many of the wooden posts that line the roadways were broken or laying over. Cables were on the ground. Tree limbs were hanging to the ground. An abundance of trash was in evidence as well. The people utilizing the park at that time were not the type of people that made me want to park nearby or be in close proximity to. I understand that police presence in the park is virtually non-existent. At one time the park was quite nice though and could be again if the city would get involved and make it a priority. Until that happens, the idea of a waterpark in that area doesn't seem to make sense.
October 2, 2009 at 7:16 p.m.Most water parks have there own sound system. This would drown out th noise from both the gun range and outdoor concerts at the park. What dose bars being open have to do with the water park? I'm not real sure why so many people think old drunks are going to want to hang out at the water park. If someone is drunk and at the park you do the same thing you do when someone is drunk and at any other public venue you call the police. Further more if the park did get water from our river it would likely be put right back in.
October 2, 2009 at 4:58 p.m.1 is the gun range still open? may be an issue w/ noise.
2. will the bars be open at the same time as the water park?
3. will outide concerts happen during park open times?
we need something but lets do it right and it stay viable on its own and all varaibles are reviewed.
October 2, 2009 at 4:11 p.m.Many good points have been made in this thread. One additional one that hasn't been dealt with directly is what impact would water restrictions (like we have encountered for the last several months) due to low levels in the Guadalupe have on this venture? If taxpayers are restricted from using water but a private business can draw down riverflow this does not sound very equitable.
I agree with the comments about the "view" when driving into the park on the Red River entrance but after driving through this past Sunday (first time in over a year) the main entrance by the ball fields looks just as bad or worse. I cannot believe how the remnants of the Little League fields have been left. Attracting visitors to Riverside is going to take more then a water park it is going to take an overall facelift.
I personally think the dollars spent on the hike/bike trail were misdirected and not well thought out and I hope the planning for any additions to Riverside will be more carefully considered. One last comment, we are seeing major oilfield businesses leaving Victoria, why not offer some incentives to existing businesses to NOT relocate?
Does Victoria need and will Victoria support a privately owned water park and a "taxpayer" funded park (the one proposed on Airline which will be much smaller and free to the public)? Tuesdays meeting should be interesting.
October 2, 2009 at 4:01 p.m.I talked to the original builder of the Riverside Convention Centers son years ago. He said that his father had hauled in enough fill dirt to raise the building site by 13'.
That is many a load of dirt.
October 2, 2009 at 3:27 p.m.True that the water park location is in a flood zone. Have any of you ever heard of building the location up to make it higher? If I remember correctly the last time we had a flood the convention center did not get any water in it. Why? Because it was built on a higher location. As far as the ball park I believe we should keep it, it has a lot of history and memories in it. Some of you all were to young to remember the greats that played in "Rosebud Stadium". And to the person who worries so much about thugs, they are every where no matter what type of business you have a thug is in your mist. So quite worrying and start making a differance in this city get involved and help make the x-roads a place to come to and enjoy. And oh yea the river walk in San Antonio does have thugs with guns. Guess you all do not read what goes on in down town SA.
October 2, 2009 at 2:07 p.m.People please, who so negative??!! This sounds like something very nice for our city and something that has been needed for a very long time. I certainly hope that our city council will come up with some incentives that will work for everyone.
Schlitterbahn has a nice park in New Braunfels and one at South Padre. They would probably not be interested in putting a park here so close to their others, however the smaller park at Sheriden is successful, and while it's no Schilitterbahn, offers a nice place for people to take their children during the summer to have some good clean fun. This would be a wonderful thing for the people of this area. We need more good wholesome activities for our children during the summer rather than having them sit in front of the TV or video games. Parents can take them to a water park right here rather than travel to Sheridan or New Braunfels. This park may not be challenging enough to keep teenagers happy, but we have lots of young families who would have a lot of fun at a facility of this type. It would definitely fill a void in this area.
October 2, 2009 at 1:59 p.m.the red river entrance to riverside park is an embarrasment
October 2, 2009 at 12:38 p.m.I must have missed something. What's so historic about Riverside Stadium? I could see someone having a sentimental attachment for something that happened there, but historic!
October 2, 2009 at 12:25 p.m.When talk turns to incentives, that's code for preferential treatment. Local taxpayer's and businesses already contributing to the local economy will be asked to help subsidize this business. There was a time when the city council was merely asked to whatasize utilites and grant variances to attract new businesses. Now it looks like city council is being asked to part with their take of the tax revenue every other business has to collect. Incentives and abatements is a mighty slippery slope to go down. And it is laughable that the guys are not so subtly hinting they might build this elsewhere.
October 2, 2009 at 12:21 p.m.tnt88 I agree that the kids need something to do but what I don't agree with you is that you would rather have a higher entry charge to keep riff raff out? Most people that have mony are thugs so I don't really see your point! Besides the fact that we do not have the water nor the funds to put in such a park. They needed to do this a few years ago. It seems that when there is not water or money everyone is on board to jump in but when the resources are readily available people choose to do other things instead. This town take 0 interest in the kids if they did have any interest, there would be more for them to do here. I blame Victoria city council for failing these kids. Its all about them and who cares about any thing else. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
October 2, 2009 at 11:30 a.m.Let's see now, where do I start. A WATER PARK... I have sat here and read all the pro's and con's comments for the water park. You talk about taxable revenue, well there won't be any taxable revenue that will come from the park, that will make it worth developing. Tell me WHAT Victoria has that will attract people from other town's cities that do not already have a water park closer to them. This project is proposed in a very bad location and will cost the developers and US more money that it will ever be able to generate. You have forgotten that water ever comes to Victoria and is developed YOU/US/ME have to pay for in tax increases. Remember the proposed water park will have to be supported by the river which means our water consumption will go up as well as your taxable rates for that usage. As we all know this will not be a year round park and if it is open half the time of the projected time I will be really surprised do to a varying weather conditions here and in the hills that love to FLOOD our RIVERS. If you would like to see anything done in Victoria on the development side and JOBS growth then push for the development of the LONE TREE area for job stimulation other than oilfield service companies. Please do not get me wrong, I MY SELF work in the oilfield service sector and have done so all my life. I have seen a number of towns that have been and are oilfield dependent and have become ghost towns and this IS WHAT VICTORIA HEADING FOR. I have watched a number of companies leave Victoria and I now more are to come SOON and I know who they are. Everyone needs to face the fact that Victoria is a dying town and our city council is not help the matters at all. I have watched our city council constantly speak of promoting the city and it's beautification program that is worthless. So please tell me what Victoria has to offer for promoting our cities economic growth, NOTHING. Victoria is not a major hub and has NO logistical reason for attracting any companies that will be willing to move in a create jobs.
October 2, 2009 at 10:37 a.m.Wonderful idea. The location needs some more thought, but I am sure it needs to be close to a major water source.As for the thugs, the simple way to keep undesirables out is to charge a fairly high rate, this will generate good revenue and keep free loaders away. Victoria has nothing for the youth. This would be a great opportunity to get some tourist dollars.
October 2, 2009 at 10:31 a.m.The Victoria Zoo turned down the land that was donated to them, why not located there?
October 2, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.@Rancher:
October 2, 2009 at 9:45 a.m.You are making blind assumptions. You don't know how much if any of this park will come out of the tax payers pocket. I do agree that the location isn't the best.
Legion357, you are absolutely right. No matter how "nice" the park would be, I'm surprised the City would even be considering this due to the challenge to secure ample water...folks, remember, you are the ones who will be paying the rates and taxes on this project. Kenneth, and it will greatly impact senior citizens as well.
October 2, 2009 at 9:39 a.m.@KennethSchustereit:
October 2, 2009 at 9:31 a.m.Your post has nothing to do with building a new water park! I don't like that fact that utilities are going up. But you are delusional if you think that amount that they are proposing going up on our utilities is going to prevent someone from eating. Now the elderly and how much they are forced to pay for meds is a whole other ballgame. The city water park is going to do alot for our town in all areas. But im sure there will be enough people like you that are going to complain enough to get the idea of the park run out of town!
This is a terrible location. There is limited access, and this area floods. Is the Lazy River going to circle around the dumpy convention center? If I were going to pitch a proposal to build something like this, I would first prove my ability to run and maintain a business. If it is going to turn out like the convention center, then flooded river water running thru it will do just fine.
October 2, 2009 at 8:37 a.m.Why would anyone want to build this in a flood zone? First flood we have they will have to shut down and be closed for weeks for cleaning.
October 2, 2009 at 8:17 a.m.It will be absolutely amazing if they can get this past by the city and an insurance company. The concept is a good one I will give them taht BUT the location??? In business they always say LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION is the key to success. TOOOO many times during the 36 years I lived there I have seen this part of the park under water. Once the river water gets mixed up in the system at this park it will take weeks to clean up then there goees revenue and then closure. Does noone remeber the failed attempt at a waterslide near palace bolwling alley/bingo? How long did that eyesore welcome visitors to our fair city coming in from houston?????
October 2, 2009 at 8:11 a.m.We need a waterpark like we need another Will Armstrong for mayor.
October 2, 2009 at 7:28 a.m.I have two comments...
First, I thought a water park was planned in that large open area just west of Tangerine subdivision, close to Memorial High School. I know that was in the paper a couple of months ago. What happened to those plans?
Also, for those of you who are so negative about "incentives..." those are MANY times offered to get a business to come to a town/city. Happens without comment in most modern cities today. I agree with the person who talked about flooding issues...when the river DOES flood, that is an area of particular concern. However, you can't keep preventing businesses from opening. Families and youth need something fun and wholesome to do in this town. The tax revenue will be a good infusion of income. The permanent (and part-time) jobs will be good for the economy. Some of you really need to break out of your "don't make any changes, keep everything the way it is (or worse yet - totally off-topic - go back to the old days of VHS and SHS), etc." and move with the times! This town is stagnating, thanks in large part to our City Council and a population who refuses to get out and vote new people onto the City Council who can make a difference.
October 2, 2009 at 5:36 a.m.I read some of the negative stuff about the water park. Seems like someone has a beef about the owner. And as far as thugs come on it is going to be a family type park. Hopefully no alcohol will be served. You can't shoot something down till you tried it. It would be a big plus for this city and you would not have to drive a hour or so to go to one and the money you would spend going out of town can now be kept in the city if this development goes through. And oh yea this is a w-a-t-e-r p-a-r-k not a c-l-u-b. Did I write this to fast for you. LOL
October 2, 2009 at 2:12 a.m.Same owner who can't seem to figure out how to get a crowd down at the convention center....first Liquid Lounge then Metropolis.....Too many thugs, hopefully that is not the crowd he is trying to attract.
He does have a nice gym though.
October 2, 2009 at 12:41 a.m.Can you get season passes? ;)
October 1, 2009 at 11:54 p.m.Sorry if I were the developers I would think twice due to flooding issues. jmo
October 1, 2009 at 9:53 p.m.victorians are just dying for somewhere to go. lots of money to be made.
October 1, 2009 at 8:39 p.m.Well, IMO, the biggest challenge will be to get water rights from GBRA to draw water from the river (even though it will be recycled), and also to get a right away from the city threw riverside park for the pipeline and pumping unit.
October 1, 2009 at 6:55 p.m.Here is your chance Victoria, all I have been reading about is what the city can do to attract people to use what Victoria has to offer. The final decision is your ball park now, this plan can draw mega people from all around not just Victoria, helping all the area businesses from eateries to hotels. Come on city council hit a home run.
October 1, 2009 at 6:17 p.m.This would be so nice. I always wondered when moving here why we had to drive to Sheriden for a water park. I hope the city can do whats needed. Victoria needs it.
October 1, 2009 at 6:09 p.m.