CScope: Happy to not deal with it
Editor, the Advocate:
I read with interest that the editors supported the CScope curriculum. I do not think that any of the editors has spent the last 27 years teaching in public schools. I have taught science grades 5 to 12 and mathematics grades 5 to 9. I have seen numerous programs come and go that were suppose to be the salvation of the students and teachers.
Forcing teachers to put a square peg in a round curriculum hole does not work.
CScope was written by various Educational Service Centers.
These centers make money and exist if they have a program that school districts purchase. CScope is an expensive program to purchase and maintain. Once a school district has obligated itself to purchase a program, they want to see results of teachers using it. Teachers who do not use a program are given poor teacher performance reports and put on a professional growth plan subject to none contract renewal.
I was fortunate the courses (AP Biology and Human Anatomy and Physiology ) I taught did not fall into the CScope curriculum. I watched the other science teachers struggle with the training and CScope curriculum.
I voiced my opinion about CScope when asked. I am just glad I am retired and do not have to be forced-fed a curriculum that may or may not fit the needs of the students. I suggest that readers go to www.proteacher.net/discussions/showthread.php?t=58502 and read various teacher comments about CScope.
Mike Stern, Yorktown