Goliad Airpark Coalition to sue the Navy

  • Print
  • 18 Comments
  • Favorite
  • Report an error Report error
    • Thank you for your submission.
      Error report or correction
      Contact name (optional) Contact phone/e-mail (optional)  
      Sending report
    • Close
  • TO GET INVOLVEDTo donate to the Goliad Airpark Coalition, contact Serena Edwards at 361-597-0176 or at serena@gotsky.com.

    To find out more about the coalition and to see the Environmental Assessment, go to www.remembergoliad.com

    A HISTORY1991: BRAC closed the Naval ...

  • SHOW ALL »
  • TO GET INVOLVEDTo donate to the Goliad Airpark Coalition, contact Serena Edwards at 361-597-0176 or at serena@gotsky.com.

    To find out more about the coalition and to see the Environmental Assessment, go to www.remembergoliad.com

    A HISTORY1991: BRAC closed the Naval Air Station in Goliad

    2000: Navy sold the property to Goliad County for $1

    Sept. 2008: Goliad County voted to offer property to Navy for $675,000 and later withdrew the offer

    Nov. 2009: The city of Corpus Christi offers to buy the airpark

    Dec. 2009: Navy completed its Environmental Assessment

    April 2010: Navy offered to purchase airpark from county for $2.36 million after an appraisal

    Sept. 2010: Navy made final offer to purchase the property, which the county let expire

    Nov. 2010: Navy announced its intent to acquire the airpark through eminent domain

GOLIAD - The Goliad Airpark Coalition announced it will sue the U.S. Navy, claiming violations of the National Environmental Policy Act in the Navy's pursuit to re-acquire the Goliad Industrial Airpark.

"The community and the coalition, we just can't sit back and let this happen. We have got to fight it," said the coalition's chair, Serena Edwards.

The Goliad County Commissioner's Court unanimously voted to support the coalition's lawsuit, but the county will not fund it, Edwards said.

"This is a privately-funded lawsuit," she said, calling the match-up a "David and Goliath" battle. "We're raising funds right now."

The coalition has retained attorney R. Gaines Griffin, of San Antonio, whose law firm is experienced in dealing with federal defense-related departments, Edwards said. Griffin is out of the country until the new year, at which time he will file the suit in the Victoria Federal District Court, his secretary said.

Griffin will also file an injunction preventing the Navy from condemning the property, which it hoped to be able to use by 2012.

The Navy announced in November it would acquire the airpark through eminent domain after the Goliad County Commissioner's Court repeatedly rejected its offers to purchase the property.

The Navy said it was "disappointed" the county didn't accept their $2.6 million offer but that, "the Navy still has a mission to perform, and we remain committed to being good neighbors," according to a news release published in November.

Citizens cited noise and air pollution, loss of property value and loss of tourism among their reasons for opposing the purchase at various court meetings this year.

But the Navy's Environmental Assessment, executed as part of the NEPA, resulted in a "Finding of No Significant Impact" should the Navy acquire the airpark. Such a finding ends the NEPA process, meaning the Navy did not have to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement, which is more thorough.

The Navy intends to use the airpark for touch-and-go flight training on a new T-6 aircraft.

Similar training on T-34 aircraft is currently done in Corpus Christi.

Corpus Christi Mayor Joe Adame said the new planes require different landing areas and that the move fits into the Navy's plan for the future.

"It's a tremendous boost for the entire South Texas economy, and we need to do everything we can to help support the Navy," he said.

The Environmental Assessment published by the Navy acknowledged a possible increase in air pollution in Goliad, roughly 130,000 tons per year, but called the impact "less than significant."

The assessment also acknowledged what it called "moderate" noise levels that would occur in 475 acres of "undeveloped and agricultural lands" surrounding the airpark and called the impact "minor."

The Navy would use the airpark to conduct about 185,000 touch-and-go training flights a year, or a little more than 500 a day, according to the assessment.

The airpark coalition contends the Navy was negligent in not conducting a more detailed Environmental Impact Statement and not holding public hearings on the issue.

The assessment concluded the proposed takeover would not "generate significant controversy."

The coalition also says the assessment was "seriously deficient" in describing the usage of land surrounding the airpark by property owners, lessees and tourists.

One nearby landowner, John Barnhart, participates in what he calls "nature tourism," and his ranch attracts visitors from around the world to the area's unique ecology.

"We think (nature tourism) would come to a crashing halt with 500 airplanes three miles from us, touching and going and buzzing around us," Barnhart said. "So, we feel very threatened."

The coalition also aims to bring attention to the Navy's apparent disregard for the Base Realignment and Closure Commission.

BRAC closed the airfield in 1991, and the Navy sold the property to Goliad County for $1 in 2000.

"In my mind, it's a double sin. On the one hand, the Navy trivializes BRAC, and on the other, it's a misuse of judicial power," Barnhart said of the acquisition.

Since it's owned the property, the county has had little luck utilizing the airpark for economic development, as noted in the Navy's November press release.

But for Edwards and the coalition, it's not about the money.

"I'm just going to fight this till the end," she said. "And I believe that everybody in Goliad County and the surrounding counties should fight for this."

Phone calls to the Navy were not returned Tuesday.




  • Print
  • 18 Comments
  • Favorite
  • Report an error Report error
    • Thank you for your submission.
      Error report or correction
      Contact name (optional) Contact phone/e-mail (optional)  
      Sending report
    • Close

Comments

  • Thank you GoliaChicka, money is NOT everything. This issue has been going on for a while. The county commissioners court has engaged the people and the people have said no. I don't know where the folks on this posting have been. It is not a sign of being unpatriotic just because folks don't want this--shame on those who have accused this.

    January 4, 2011 at 4:05 p.m.
  • Did you miss the part where it says 500 touch and goes a day? Or the 130,000 TONS of pollution? I imagine that none of the Goliad residents who are for this project are the ones that live near Berclair. Everytime there is some controversy like this, the folks who are not affected by it in the least are the first ones to mention money. Money money money money. Why do you think its always about the money? With UEC its about the water, with the Navy its about pollution and quality of life. Its not about the money. Get your priorities straight - MONEY IS NOT EVERYTHING.

    January 3, 2011 at 11:54 a.m.
  • Good grief. The Navy sold the land for a dollar in 1991 and now they are willing to pay 2.6 million? Goliad has done absolutely nothing with this land and now has a chance to make that kind of profit and instead they are protesting and suing. Be a good American and support the Navy and make the money to boot. This is ridiculous that we have a community unwilling to help America!

    December 29, 2010 at 10:42 a.m.
  • I live in Goliad and would be proud to have the Navy flyboys practice their touch and go's here! Go Navy!!

    December 29, 2010 at 10:26 a.m.
  • Didn't the Navy give the land to Goliad to start with? Now they have buy it back? One taxpayer funded agency swapping dollars with another? This is truely insane.

    December 29, 2010 at 8:59 a.m.
  • Seriously. The Navy had the land, gave it to the county when liberals cut defense funding, and now the Navy needs it back and like spoiled little kids the county is crying. C'mon grow up and be proud to be an American.

    December 29, 2010 at 8:54 a.m.
  • I hope everyone keeps believing that this is just for the Navy. Their is a airport at the island that the military used all the time. Their is a fire burning under a wet wood pile. I believe Corpus Christi has something else in mind with military as a front.

    December 29, 2010 at 8:49 a.m.
  • "we just can't sit back and let this happen We have got to fight it"
    Isn’t that what Fannin said just before he got massacred?

    Instead of wasting you money on lawyers and lawsuits, you folks should hire a team of psychiatrists and physiologists so you may find what in San Antonio River water that makes western Europeans think they’re invincible in the face of insurmountable odds.

    Really, this has been going on since Bowie, Travis and Fannin among other folks started drinking this water. It’s not like you need another massacre re-enactment. You people are going to get creamed, AGAIN!

    December 29, 2010 at 8:47 a.m.
  • Goltsiad- yes I live in Victoria, but I was also a Navy wife. The military and civilian contractors have to buy gas, they have to eat, and they may even find a place to rent. That is stimulating your economy. I have never heard of a town being so disrespectful to our military. Like another poster said it is a slap to the face.

    Sofedup- my generalization was unfair, I am sure there are people in Goliad like yourself. My comment was geared more to the "powers that be".

    December 29, 2010 at 7:54 a.m.
  • I agree they should have taken the money and move on, maybe it would cut our high taxes that we have in Goliad, I agree the animals will ajust and I really don't think it going to be as bad as the news makes it. I should hope they wouldn't waste more tax dollars on something that county don't have to spend and I doubt that if the folks fighting this would pay for it out of there pocket because they be broke in a short time. Like someone say the lawyer is going to be the only ones winning they going to be paid win or lose, Maybe if this lawyer would not charge and (see how long he stay with the folks ) he is only in it for the money. That I agree with. Take a vote and let the people say what they want bet a vote would show how much support they have fighting this. I like these people but come on.

    December 29, 2010 at 7:37 a.m.
  • I am a Goliad County resident and I agree that the Navy should take over. I was for the commissioners accepting what the Navy offered.
    I am l00% behind our military! All my freedom is the result of men and now women who care enough to fight and lose their lives, sometimes. So please don't condemn all of us in Goliad for the actions of a small group!
    No, this would bring no business to our small town as in the past the folks lived and shopped in Beeville.

    December 29, 2010 at 7:29 a.m.
  • I think they should Navy should consider southern Lavaca County for a spot.

    December 29, 2010 at 6:31 a.m.
  • Goliad will not get any money for the airpark and the Navy will take it over by whatever means possible. You just don't do what Goliad is doing in a time of war! It is a slap in the face to everyone in the military. The U.S. Government will win this one. Goliad, I say make lemonaide out of the lemons you will be delt!

    December 29, 2010 at 6:26 a.m.
  • Justamom.

    I wholeaheartly agree with you. I do not care whether it is a touch and go pad. Goilad goes into .........the "PENHEAD" section of the day.

    AMERICA IS AT WAR and these fools in GOLIAD is doing an unpatriotic thing. I hope, I pray that GOLIAD does NOT receive ANY FEDERAL AID or HELP !!!!!!!!!

    December 29, 2010 at 5:54 a.m.
  • even if they get the 2.6 million the navy originally offered, their lawyer will keep a nice chunk of it

    December 29, 2010 at 1:50 a.m.
  • justamom the article said a touch and go testing facitily nothing about buying local fuel and other things that stimulate the local ecomony.......i bet you live in Victoria.......

    December 28, 2010 at 10:57 p.m.
  • I'm all for the Navy having the airpark, it was theirs to begin with. Our boys need a place to practice, they fight for our freedom! The animals and wildlife will adjust!

    December 28, 2010 at 10:09 p.m.
  • Oh what happened to the small town patriotic support our troops? Support them as long as they do as you say? The Navy would bring business to your little dying town, get over yourselves and welcome the military that has so bravely fought for you.

    December 28, 2010 at 9:40 p.m.