So let me get this straight.
Clark represented Ratcliff's accuser on drug charges long after the Ratcliff matter was settled and Williams thought it best to get someone else.
But McDonald, who prosecuted Ratcliff, is okay to be the replacement and this is not a conflict? Really? I would have thought Clark would have been the better choice--less previous involvement.
Does Williams receive any input from the DA on these selections?
Is this Still going on??? Would love to see how much I have paid for all this as a tax payer.