CBS might join Victoria Television Group lineup
Print- •
- •
-
11 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •
For more informationTo learn more about the Victoria Television Group, visit crossroadstoday.com
"Retransmission consent" vs. "must-carry" status:Must-carry stations are generally guaranteed carriage, but, if broadcasters invoke this right, they cannot demand compensation from the cable operator.
Retransmission consent may involve compensation from the cable company to the broadcaster for use of ...
- SHOW ALL »
"Retransmission consent" vs. "must-carry" status:Must-carry stations are generally guaranteed carriage, but, if broadcasters invoke this right, they cannot demand compensation from the cable operator.
Retransmission consent may involve compensation from the cable company to the broadcaster for use of the signal.
Broadcast stations must decide between must-carry and retransmission consent every three years.
Source: Federal Communications Commission website's Fact Sheet on Cable Carriage of Broadcast Stations
DID YOU KNOW?There are multiple types of television service - traditional full-service stations and low-power stations. Here is some information on the latter:
The FCC introduced low-power television service in 1982 for locally-oriented television service in small communities.
...- SHOW ALL »
DID YOU KNOW?There are multiple types of television service - traditional full-service stations and low-power stations. Here is some information on the latter:
The FCC introduced low-power television service in 1982 for locally-oriented television service in small communities.
Such stations sometimes tailor programming to specific viewer groups on basis of age, language, interest, etc.
The distance at which such low-power stations can be viewed depends on many factors, such as antenna height, transmitter power, transmitting antenna and the nature of the environment.
Low-power stations maintain "secondary spectrum priority" to full stations, meaning they may not cause interference to existing or future full stations' reception. They must yield to full stations when interference occurs.
When interference occurs between low-power stations and cable systems, the system or station that had initial use of the channel maintains first priority and is not responsible for correcting the interference.
Source: Federal Communications Commission online "FCC Consumer Facts" sheet
A CBS affiliate could soon join the ranks of the Victoria Television Group, and could mean more TV programs for viewers who don't subscribe to cable.
Negotiations are under way to bring the network under the umbrella of the Victoria company, which already owns rights to multiple networks, including ABC, Fox, NBC, Telemundo and Univision.
The deal is not final, a Victoria Television Group representative said Thursday.
Suddenlink Communications' programming department had not yet heard of a new affiliate, said Gene Ragan, Suddenlink's director of corporate communications, Thursday.
The cable company is required by law to have signed consent, Ragan explained, and could go about the deal in two ways.
The cable company could either enter into must-carry status, in which the TV station talks with Suddenlink and decides the cable company must carry the station, he said. Additionally, it could go with a retransmission consent agreement status, where Suddenlink arranges a contract with the TV station.
"As far as I know, we haven't heard anything about a CBS affiliate," he said. "At this point it's too early to really say much."
The switchover would mean advertisers could place local commercials on Victoria's CBS affiliate, instead of the current San Antonio spots that air, said Patrick Guerra, president of The Guerra Group, a Victoria advertising agency. Guerra said he meets with TV station representatives Friday to iron out advertising details.
"We're pretty jazzed about it," he said of the change. "I think it's going to be a real plus."
The only drawback is the lack of competition in the area, Guerra said.
In larger markets, media companies compete for the shared market with competitive pricing. Although Victoria's rates are fair, the cost per thousand remains somewhat high.
"Say there's 100,000 people in the Crossroads viewing area," he said. "In Houston there might be 5 million. That's 50 times the size of Victoria, but rates aren't 50 times as high."
With those calculations, Guerra said a $4,000 spot on Houston's 10 p.m. news should cost about $80 in Victoria. Those rates actually come to about $350, however.
"There's always pluses and minuses," he said of the purchase. "But most of it is good news."
Jeff Pryor, general manager of the Victoria Television Group, was out of the office and unavailable for comment Thursday afternoon.
Print- •
- •
-
11 Comments
- •
Favorite- •
-
Report error
-
Thank you for your submission.Error report or correction
- Close
-
- •


Comments
Maybe, all it would take is for most everybody to tune into something besides VTG stations, and be willing to say that's what they're doing. Either nobody asks, or nobody tells. Or maybe, nobody cares. Because truly, I don't know even one person that finds a local VTG station to be acceptable.
Accept substandard and you will receive substandard. Demand better and you will get better!
July 16, 2011 at 1:05 a.m.Bring it in if you want. But I'm not giving up Dominique Sachse on Houston NBC! Arooooooo!
July 15, 2011 at 8:42 p.m.i much prefer having some stations out of SA/HOU/CC <<< dump kavu and pick up kiii
July 15, 2011 at 4 p.m.Local station programming in HD are on suddenlink channels 106,104 and 103, THIS channel is now channel 125, since the switch to all digital that is.
July 15, 2011 at 3:53 p.m.A wise man once said "if it's going to be of the same quality of kavu, i'll pass". I'm with that guy. The Victoria Television Group should be embarrassed of their level of quality and lack of professionalism.
July 15, 2011 at 3:39 p.m.Well all locals for Dish Network are digital, but not HD. With Suddenlink...local broadcast are not HD but all network were with the exception of CBS. Kens is a poor excuse of a station though. KHOU is really strong. That is the direction we need to go in.
July 15, 2011 at 12:52 p.m.I said CBS but I don't always get HD off my OTA for our NBC either...They do a great job on Fox & ABC.
July 15, 2011 at 11:51 a.m.KHOU out of Houston is awesome. While Dish does not have an agreement for HD coming from it, it is digital. I have a feeling it will be run like NBC which is sad. Essentially throwing another station on the backs of hapless high schoolers working part time jobs. Would this not be a monopoly as well? Especially on advertising dollars for television? While I would like not being interrupted by Spurs/Rockets games, it still is a terrible option because you know it will be third tier like our NBC. @Mike: The Super Bowl is covered the same on each of the 4 networks. It rotates every year...at least for now.
July 15, 2011 at 11:39 a.m.If Victoria Television Group is going to strat broadcasting CBS programs I would hope they improve the skill set of their tech folks. The local NBC (KMOL) has more problems than there is room to discuss here. How many times have they gone black when switching from local to national programming? Now it seems that they can't sync the video and audio for hours at a time. It is amazing that FCC has not stepped in and done something.
July 15, 2011 at 10:27 a.m.I can support a Victoria CBS station but I would like a strong OTA digital signal because the Super Bowl is usually televised on CBS..... I have satellite and with that I receive a non digital Houston's KHOU channel 11.
I think it would be great to have programming from the 3 major networks.
July 15, 2011 at 9:50 a.m.if it's going to be of the same quality of kavu, ill pass
July 15, 2011 at 8:17 a.m.