Marine sues ex-wife for slander; she countersues

Marine sues ex-wife for slander; she countersues

  • Print
  • 14 Comments
  • Favorite
  • Report an error Report error
    • Thank you for your submission.
      Error report or correction
      Contact name (optional) Contact phone/e-mail (optional)  
      Sending report
    • Close

A Marine is suing his ex-wife for slander over claims she contacted his employer, falsely claiming he abandoned his family and failed to pay child support.

Jerry Rogers Jr. filed the lawsuit against Lori A. Rogers in district court in late September.

"The defendant either knew or should have known in the exercise of ordinary care that the statements were false and were intended to cripple the plaintiff's military career," according to the lawsuit. "These defamatory statements constitute slander."

She has since filed a countersuit, claiming abuse of process, which is the use of a legal process to accomplish an unlawful purpose.

"To shut her up, he hits her with a lawsuit," said Heather Godwin, Lori Rogers' attorney. "It is unfounded because nothing she said was untrue."

Rogers is a gunnery sergeant in the Marine Corps and has completed numerous tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was stationed at Camp Pendleton in San Diego before he was transferred to a reserve unit in Louisiana in June.

In November 2010, while in California, the couple divorced, ending more than 14 years of marriage.

The former wife was granted custody of the couple's two children, a 14-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl. She was also granted $1,396 in monthly child support and $250 in monthly spousal support until 2020, according to court documents.

They both live in Victoria County.

Slander tough to prove

"It is very unusual to have a slander lawsuit filed in a family law setting, but the military is an unusual setting," said James Paulsen, a law professor at South Texas College of Law. "There are potentially severe penalties if Mr. Rogers has indeed failed to pay his child support."

He pointed out that failure to pay child support could be considered a criminal offense in the military.

Aside from the military, slander cases can prove difficult to win, period, especially in family law.

"While there is no formal rule that says you can't sue for slander or libel in a divorce case, judges and lawyers tend to expect that in divorce cases people will say and do things they wouldn't normally do," said Paulsen. "Judges and lawyers try to roll with the punches while encouraging them to be civil."

Slander is difficult to prove because it has to be proven the comments were made on purpose and were not only false, but malicious, he said.

After reviewing the preliminary court filings, he said, "This strikes me as a case that should be resolved quickly out of court."

His side of the story

The lawsuit contends that in June, the ex-wife called Rogers' chain of command and made false allegations about him.

She also sent an email to him threatening to call the Marines' reserve lieutenant general to make additional false allegations.

In the lawsuit, Rogers claimed to be current on his child support and denied ever abandoning his family. He did point out that his transfer to the reserve base in Louisiana presented some administrative issues that needed to be resolved related to interstate payment plans.

Before the defendant's remarks, Rogers said he enjoyed a long and distinguished career and excellent professional reputation in the Marine Corps, according to the lawsuit.

But since the allegations were made, Rogers has endured shame, embarrassment, humiliation, mental pain and anguish and injury to his reputation, according to his lawsuit.

He is seeking damages for future losses of income and assignments as well as attorney's fees.

Additionally, he asked for and was granted a temporary restraining order, which has since lapsed, preventing his ex-wife from making further allegations to his employer.

Brian Rogers, Jerry Rogers' brother and attorney, did not return calls to the Advocate for comment.

Rogers could not be reached for comment because his phone number was unlisted.

Her side of the story

In her formal response and in a telephone conversation, Lori Rogers said her ex's claims are unfounded.

"It's been very emotionally draining. My life has been at a standstill waiting for the next shoe to drop," she said.

She is unemployed and lives with her parents and her children.

"It was my intent to find out why he was not paying the support and when he was going to pay it.

According to her formal response, she warned Rogers that if she could not get information regarding the support payment, she would call the military's family readiness officer.

When he failed to make a subsequent payment, she called the family readiness officer on Sept. 19.

She asked if the officer could help encourage her former husband to pay the support he owed, according to her response.

She explained he had been late on support payments on previous occasions, but she denied ever using the word "abandon" in regards to his actions.

On Sept. 20, the family readiness officer called to let her know Rogers had made a payment and that he claimed he no longer owed spousal support.

"Mr. Rogers is under the impression that a spousal judgment rendered in California is unenforceable in Texas," said Godwin, the ex-wife's attorney.

Godwin, who cited the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act as explanation why Jerry Rogers had to continue his payments, said no motion has been filed or granted to stop his spousal support payments.

"He's intimidating her for pursuing her rights to support herself," Godwin said.

Lori Rogers is seeking damages for actual, economic and compensatory damages.

"Ultimately, I want the harassment and bullying to stop," the ex-wife said. "I just want this to end so me and my kids can move on."

As of Nov. 18, she said Rogers had canceled visitations with his children, but not the three periods right before Nov. 18, and was up to date on his child support, but he had still not made a spousal support payment.

Corrected Nov. 28, 2011




  • Print
  • 14 Comments
  • Favorite
  • Report an error Report error
    • Thank you for your submission.
      Error report or correction
      Contact name (optional) Contact phone/e-mail (optional)  
      Sending report
    • Close

Comments

  • I can agree that it is unusual to see a slander case in family court, but that is still not enough to make it a news story. There are plenty of unusual things that go on in this town, but they don't make a story.

    We may not agree as to the news worthiness, but I bet we agree that Attorney Brian Rogers accomplished what he set out to do--inform a jury pool.

    You don't have to answer that.

    November 28, 2011 at 6:16 p.m.
  • Edith,

    I'll jump in here and stress this point:
    Oddness/Unusualness – Because slander lawsuits, particularly those filed in a family court setting are unusual.

    This is the key factor that made this case warrant a news story. Of course, readers are free to debate the merits of every news story.

    We encourage all of you to tune in at 10 a.m. weekdays when we discuss these stories at our news meetings and to vote on our front-page polls. We regularly survey community members about their interests.

    November 28, 2011 at 5:07 p.m.
  • I too believe that this should stay private between the two parties. Why put it out there to taint a jury with public opinion? Is there going to be a story in the paper for every dirty divorce that occurs?

    November 28, 2011 at 4:22 p.m.
  • Gheni,

    Thank you for your explanation. However, I must ask again, why is this a news story? You say:

    Proximity-- Because the lawsuit was filed in The Crossroads
    Lots of lawsuits are filed everyday in the Crossroads, and we don’t see those in the paper.

    Currency-- Because divorced couples often find themselves fighting over child and spousal support
    The real story there would be the divorcing couple who is NOT fighting over custody and support.

    Conflict-- Because it involves a legal fight between two people
    Could be the first clue why there is a divorce, no new news there.

    Impact—Because the outcome of this lawsuit could set a legal precedent
    Who told you that? This is not the first military couple to get a divorce, have money issues or file a lawsuit.

    Human Interest— Because this story could effect how exes go about collecting child/spousal support in the future.
    I seriously doubt it.

    Oddness/Unusualness – Because slander lawsuits, particularly those filed in a family court setting are unusual.
    This is the only place where you might come close to having a news story, but the lack of the other reasons you cite negates it.

    November 28, 2011 at 2:21 p.m.
  • Just because this story meets your criteria of being news worthy, doesn't necessarily mean it is newsworthy. This is more in the line of National Enquirer & to be quite blunt serves no purpose except to air the dirty laundry of the two adults who chose to end their marriage.

    November 28, 2011 at 1:42 p.m.
  • EdithAnn,

    At least it's not a 3 legged chicken story. Remember the Victoria Advocate also has a tendency to "develop" news by interviewing people in coffeeshops.

    "This just in (deet), (deet), (deet) (ole time news sound) it has been found that several of the cafes in town are using canned apples in thier apple pie! Oh the humanity!" And what would you like as a headline tomarrow?

    November 28, 2011 at 1:09 p.m.
  • Good morning,

    I’d like to address your questions regarding why this is a news story. There are eight major values that determine newsworthiness - prominence, proximity, currency, timeliness, conflict, impact, human interest and oddness/ unusualness. This story meets at least six of these values:

    Proximity-- Because the lawsuit was filed in The Crossroads
    Currency-- Because divorced couples often find themselves fighting over child and spousal support
    Conflict-- Because it involves a legal fight between two people
    Impact—Because the outcome of this lawsuit could set a legal precedent
    Human Interest— Because this story could effect how exes go about collecting child/spousal support in the future.
    Oddness/Unusualness – Because slander lawsuits, particularly those filed in a family court setting are unusual.

    Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks for reading.

    November 28, 2011 at 12:09 p.m.
  • To bad the VA didn’t do a story on my ex wife’s divorce accusation of me touching her inappropriately.

    November 28, 2011 at 11:40 a.m.
  • Please don't judge unless you know the whole story. This was a happy marriage interrupted by many emotionally draining deployments. They signed up for it, but we've all done things with the best intentions that did not pan out. Let's be supportive of our military and their families. They carry a burden for us and we need to love them, not criticize them.

    November 28, 2011 at 10:24 a.m.
  • He is current with his child support but behind on his spousal support. She is unemployed time for her to get a job/. I am still wondering why this story was even posted ????? Oh well nothing surprises me anymore

    November 28, 2011 at 5 a.m.
  • Vic. Advocate this is ridiculous. Why is this news worthy? This is by far the low of the low for the Advocate.

    November 27, 2011 at 11:42 p.m.
  • I'm curious as to why this is a news story.

    Is this the new standard? I don't care if either party contacted the Advocate to seek publicity, or if the Advocate tracked them down--why is this a news story?

    November 27, 2011 at 10:14 p.m.