Con: City should first maintain what it has
Dec. 9, 2012 at 12:09 p.m.
Updated Dec. 10, 2012 at 12:10 p.m.
• 2012 and 2011 valued at $533,570
• 2010 valued at $533,980
• 2009 valued at $542,170
• 2008 valued at $627,830
• 2007 valued at $475,400
• 2006 valued at $582,990
• 2005 valued at $148,290
• 2012 to 2007 valued at $28,350
• 2006 and 2005 valued at $30,170
what $530,000 could buy
• Develop trail along the Jim Branch Outfall connecting Ben Wilson and Ben Jordan streets: $400,000Add RV spaces to the Youth Sports Complex/Community Center: $50,000Upgrade Fox's Bend to allow for vehicles, bikes, runners and walkers: $80,000
• Add security lighting in Riverside Park from Rose Garden to Riverside Stadium: $250,000Clear/remove debris along Guadalupe River corridor and West Outfall: $100,000Upgrade/rebuild restrooms at Community Center Park, Hopkins Park and Grover's Bend: $150,000Develop historical, interpretative displays at Riverside Park: $25,000
• Develop nature trail at Lone Tree Creek Park: $200,000Renovate the trail at Reed Park: $135,000Develop Grover's Bend into trail for bikes, runners and walkers: $90,000Develop three information stations in Riverside Park: $75,000Develop mountain bike route in Riverside Park: $10,000
• Develop a water playground in the north section of the city: $500,000
• Convert the storage area on Stayton Avenue to a restroom: $50,000Acquire additional land north of Riverside Park to preserve historical and natural resources: $200,000
Source: 2012 Master Parks Plan estimates
Riverside Park boasts 565 acres - a rose garden, children's park, 27-hole golf course, baseball fields, duck pond, picnic areas and grills, a boat ramp, basketball court, walking trails, an RV park, volleyball courts - and even the Texas Zoo.
It's the largest park in the city's system.
On Nov. 30, elected officials voted to expand it near the Red River Street entrance, despite already having a list of 30 park improvement projects totaling $13.8 million.
While those officials say it was a rare opportunity for future generations, some of their constituents say it was hardly prudent.
The final deal cost $530,000 for 21.72 acres and a building in the floodplain adjacent to the park at 1407 W. Red River St.
Jackie Parks, a Victoria real estate agent, called the city's expansion a flat-out "bad investment."
"I think the city acquires way too much property and takes it off the tax rolls," said Parks, who has lived in the city since 1960. "I'm personally sick of it."
To put the purchase in perspective, the estimated cost to repair one mile of Navarro Street from Bottom Road to Goodwin Avenue with curb, gutter and streetlights is $524,956, according to the city's master street plan.
The property purchase itself is the cheap part but maintaining it is where taxpayers lose, Parks said.
He said the spending issue is entrenched through all levels of government, from school boards to the Congress.
"The only thing the city needs to spend money on is what we've got to have: maintaining streets, water and sewer," Parks said. "Besides, why would you put offices where buildings flood?"
Victoria Planning and Development Services Deputy Director Dan McGinn confirmed most of Riverside Park is in the floodplain, including the entire tract of land for the expansion.
"It's not in the floodway - that would be a little bit closer to the river; you're very limited on what you can do in the floodway," McGinn said.
While the building on the addition is grandfathered in, McGinn said, the site has elevation requirements that any new improvements would need to be above 64 feet. The at-grade elevation is 61 feet.
"There's definitely some additional costs," McGinn said.
Parks said the money spent on the Riverside expansion would better serve the public if left in the bank.
"A politician is a politician: As long as we keep giving it to them, they'll keep spending it," he said. "But just because you got it doesn't mean you have to spend it."
The city council has no formal plan for the land or building and no formal estimate of what repairs to the building or long-term maintenance would cost.
In the past 10 years, updates and maintenance to the city's parks have cost $13.1 million.
Rob Austin, who owns Austin's Termite and Pest Control, said he would rather see the money go to a project that brings people in from out of town - another quality-of-life project.
He said when he first heard of the purchase it smelled "fishy" and the final price seemed too high.
"We have enough parks and most aren't being utilized," Austin said. "Put something here that the people will get something out of."
PRO: Park expansion is an investment in the future click HERE