Last login: Tuesday, June 17, 2008
The issue at hand is not a moral one but a social issue. We as a society have placed parenting equal to issues such as career and hobbies. It is magical thinking to hold that children can be raised in the 45 minutes after work and before night school while parents expand their horizons or engage in another pursuit . Folks tell themselves that to justify the neglect but TYC, TDCJ, drug rehabs, youth homes, 12 step meetings, and other places lost souls end up are full of "you can have it all" moms, and dads who said "no thank you" to the sacrifices it would take to make that possible.
Flag this comment
The issue stems primarily with the Advocates intent to be biased in its presentation of information. As self appointed arbiter of what should and should not be in the public's awareness based by censoring truthful information calls for scrutiny. By allowing the accuser of Sheriff Ratcliff an anonymous heart string piece portraying him in an angelic light while placing the Sheriff in a "Willie Horton silhouette" front page piece speaks of a half step above tabloid journalism.
When the false allegations against our Noble Sheriff Ratcliff came about his "friends" circled wagon. And now his enemies schemes are being revealed. His complete vindication is certain and The "eating of CROW" will surely began.
An Autopsy can have only a few outcomes homicide, suicide , or natural. Being angry with me will not change the fact that a young graduate full of hope died around Christmas , or an other young person jumped of a bridge. Suicide speaks not only to the individuals personnel pain but their perception of how their community will deal with them when they reach out for help. Will they be judged ? Will they be accepted for who and what they are ? Or persecuted ? Will they be told that their lack of hope is really a lack of faith and the pain they are experiencing is self inflicted ? Answer these questions ? Would you rather have these people in your mist and have to help them or or you quietly thankful they choose the path they did so not to be bothered by their needs?
post away nun. maybe we can create a resource ?
I am paying attention. You have nothing. No district judge will grant you a citation , nor will he be removed for cause. Thus, all you have is a pig-in-a-poke. This is an exercise of self indulgence and delusions of self importance. If you are not summarily dismissed I will eat-my-hat. Still German Chocolate Cake. You have inspired me to move to have my mother in law installed as the Queen of England. Given your logic just because a mechanism is in place that makes it possible still provides no provability.
German Chocolate Cake § 87.017. SUSPENSION PENDING TRIAL; TEMPORARY APPOINTEE. (a) After the issuance of the order requiring citation of the officer, the district judge may temporarily suspend the officer and may appoint another person to perform the duties of the office.(b) The judge may not suspend the officer until the person appointed to serve executes a bond, with at least two good and sufficient sureties, in an amount fixed by the judge and conditioned as required by the judge. The bond shall be used to pay damages and costs to the suspended officer if the grounds for removal are found at trial to be insufficient or untrue. In an action to recover on the bond it is necessary to allege and prove that the temporary appointee actively aided and instigated the filing and prosecution of the removal action. The suspended officer must also serve written notice on the temporary appointee and the appointee's bondsman, within 90 days after the date the bond is executed, stating that the officer intends to hold them liable on the bond and stating the grounds for that liability.(c) If the final judgment establishes the officer's right to the office, the county shall pay the officer from the general fund of the county an amount equal to the compensation received by the temporary appointee.
Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 149, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987.
Start the Bake sale Dumb jerks.. No Judge worth their weight will let you proceed with anything less then a million dollar security Bond. You folks need to get a life. You dumb folks tried to replace your insignificant issues WITH the will of the voters with Bill Clinton prancing around with a corn cob stuck some where saying dumb as** things like "rule of law" --all of those idiots are gone and so shall you all be. By the way I prefer German Chocolate Cake .
This comment was removed by the user.
Well I say it is hypocritical to say one is pro life then say but only certain life. Tell me you two if to make sure the child lived would you be willing to allow Heather's two mommies to raise it ? Or let Hindu, Buddhist, or Muslim parents raise them as they see fit ? And with your tax dollars for the children's necessity's ? If Life is your goal then the amendment should read...The act of termination of a pregnancy in these United States by artificial means is unlawful. Any unwanted child will be supported until the child is 18 years of age guaranteed by the full good faith and credit of the United States Government up to one half of all her assets bar none. And any citizen who is not a felon or has no crimes of abuse against children without regard to race, or gender , or religion , or marital status shall receive a stiphene to provide for any unwanted child's basic needs equally who was rescued from abortion by this amendment to the Constitution. Agree to this and I will agree. Any less is just self important religious hot air. .