Hey Advocate...can you poll the comunitee to see if there is enough support for a "Pet Fanciers Law" simular to the one suggested?
I'll take it to City Council to get a reading if nobodye else will. Seams like we have a lot of complinng about the problem. Lets not beat ours heads against the wall here. If there is a solution, let's use it.
Here is a simple solution,
A person is allowed to keep three (3) domesticated animals in a single-family residence, and two (2) domesticated animals per unit of a multiple-family residence. If you live in a single-family residence and have more than three (3) animals you are required to obtain a Pet Fancier's Permit.
Note: Only one potbellied pig is allowed, regardless of residence or license type.
Pet Fanciers:
A person is allowed to keep three (3) domesticated animals in a single-family residence, and two (2) domesticated animals per unit of a multiple-family residence. If you live in a single-family residence and have more than three (3) animals you are required to obtain a Pet Fancier's Permit. This permit allows you to keep up to seven (7) animals (dogs, cats, ferrets, potbellied pigs). Residents of a multiple-family residence may not obtain a pet fancier permit.
Note: Only one potbellied pig is allowed, regardless of residence or license type.
The City of Victoria could charge $40.00 dollars annually for extra revenues to compensate enforcement.
@Robyn676
"It’s the owner it’s the owner"
By your irrational and twisted sense of reality, any dog that is owned by an irresponsible pet owner is violent. Not true...
Take a walk in any impoverished neighborhood and you will be attacked by a pack of Chihuahuas and other little ankle biters. They do not kill you. But you declare it’s the owners of the pits, not the pits themselves?
Yes the owners should have to pay some sort of restitution. I think it would be acceptable for the city to have an ordinance of no more than three dogs per residence unless you purchase a breeders permit from the city. These extra funds can go to Animal Control to hire more officers, educate the public, and buy more gas for the doggie gas chamber... whatever.
Maybe the next victim will be carrying a bag of skittles and ice tea; the media will pay closer attention to the story resulting in a stringent review of current animal control laws!
"What about all the other non-pitbull dog bite victims".
Sure no problem...I'll examine the dog carcass after I shoot it dead.
Are we blaming the apt./property owner on this than?
Anybody feel like "thug life played out" meaning "you live by the sword you die by the sword"?
Must have been home from work on his lunch break...huh
Resently there was a quadruple shooting at the Dragon Club on Laurent St. Not one person in that club had on starched jeans or a cowboy hat. They had on baseball hats and baggy jeans. Most of the females were sporting their sexy panties on the outside just below their muffin tops!
Which club y'all want to patronize?
@justamom
Are you arguing that a privately owned business man opens a business in Victoria and he is to blame for poverty and crime? I mean his companies dress code is to blame for poverty and crime in victoria? Could it be that his dress code was put in place to limit the crime?
I agree with the fact he is a business owner who is trying to be successful, hence the rules. I don't agree with his last statement "the rules are not intended to be discriminatory."
The dress code is absolutely meant to discriminate against the "gangsta" who brings trouble to his establishment. He should have had the nerve and called it like it is and stop pandering to the politically correct loons like justamom.
@Sue,
You will be voting for the politician that does not fly first class than? That's the criteria for the next leader of the free world? I hope you don't stroke out when you learn the President has an entire jumbo jet!
Adam
Spot on!
Burning trash on his back porch...are you kidding?!
Newsletter
Hey Advocate...can you poll the comunitee to see if there is enough support for a "Pet Fanciers Law" simular to the one suggested?
I'll take it to City Council to get a reading if nobodye else will. Seams like we have a lot of complinng about the problem. Lets not beat ours heads against the wall here. If there is a solution, let's use it.
Here is a simple solution,
A person is allowed to keep three (3) domesticated animals in a single-family residence, and two (2) domesticated animals per unit of a multiple-family residence. If you live in a single-family residence and have more than three (3) animals you are required to obtain a Pet Fancier's Permit.
Note: Only one potbellied pig is allowed, regardless of residence or license type.
Pet Fanciers:
A person is allowed to keep three (3) domesticated animals in a single-family residence, and two (2) domesticated animals per unit of a multiple-family residence. If you live in a single-family residence and have more than three (3) animals you are required to obtain a Pet Fancier's Permit. This permit allows you to keep up to seven (7) animals (dogs, cats, ferrets, potbellied pigs). Residents of a multiple-family residence may not obtain a pet fancier permit.
Note: Only one potbellied pig is allowed, regardless of residence or license type.
The City of Victoria could charge $40.00 dollars annually for extra revenues to compensate enforcement.
@Robyn676
"It’s the owner it’s the owner"
By your irrational and twisted sense of reality, any dog that is owned by an irresponsible pet owner is violent. Not true...
Take a walk in any impoverished neighborhood and you will be attacked by a pack of Chihuahuas and other little ankle biters. They do not kill you. But you declare it’s the owners of the pits, not the pits themselves?
Yes the owners should have to pay some sort of restitution. I think it would be acceptable for the city to have an ordinance of no more than three dogs per residence unless you purchase a breeders permit from the city. These extra funds can go to Animal Control to hire more officers, educate the public, and buy more gas for the doggie gas chamber... whatever.
Maybe the next victim will be carrying a bag of skittles and ice tea; the media will pay closer attention to the story resulting in a stringent review of current animal control laws!
"What about all the other non-pitbull dog bite victims".
Sure no problem...I'll examine the dog carcass after I shoot it dead.
Are we blaming the apt./property owner on this than?
Anybody feel like "thug life played out" meaning "you live by the sword you die by the sword"?
Must have been home from work on his lunch break...huh
Resently there was a quadruple shooting at the Dragon Club on Laurent St. Not one person in that club had on starched jeans or a cowboy hat. They had on baseball hats and baggy jeans. Most of the females were sporting their sexy panties on the outside just below their muffin tops!
Which club y'all want to patronize?
@justamom
Are you arguing that a privately owned business man opens a business in Victoria and he is to blame for poverty and crime? I mean his companies dress code is to blame for poverty and crime in victoria? Could it be that his dress code was put in place to limit the crime?
I agree with the fact he is a business owner who is trying to be successful, hence the rules. I don't agree with his last statement "the rules are not intended to be discriminatory."
The dress code is absolutely meant to discriminate against the "gangsta" who brings trouble to his establishment. He should have had the nerve and called it like it is and stop pandering to the politically correct loons like justamom.
@Sue,
You will be voting for the politician that does not fly first class than? That's the criteria for the next leader of the free world? I hope you don't stroke out when you learn the President has an entire jumbo jet!
Adam
Spot on!
Burning trash on his back porch...are you kidding?!