AnonymousUser

itisi

Comment history

  • itisi 

    And I qoute, "for everything you read in that book, look to your left, and you will find another book that will contradict everything you just read."

    Would you like to say that comment one more time?

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    This comment was removed by the user.

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    Edith Ann,
    I will agree with you on executive orders all presidents have that privilege, but however they have to remain with the scope of the constitution. Obama commented back in September 2011, that he did not have the authority without congress to do anything about our immigration laws. But however Obama must have had a brain fart, and realized “hey wait a minute here, I believe the constitution is a living breathing document so therefore I can manipulate the constitution as I choose.” Now that synopsis is based the liberal faith.

    Mike,
    Is there such a thing as a liberal redneck as long as there is free beer involved, because all of those drone airstrike is what a redneck would do, BTW which I do not disagree with, but from the stand point of right and wrong is it legal? After all you make the claim that the president is a constitutional scholar and a professor of law. Oh, do they tweet the Miranda Warning prior to those airstrikes, I’m just asking?

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    Now we have 800,000 thousand refugees, because that is about the only way this president could pull this off without going through congress.

    Edith Ann, you bet your bottom dollar I contacted Washington! LOL!!!!

    Mike, Obama must be the most gifted and smartest attorney on the dang planet.
    Cheney, and waterboarding, don’t believe anyone was killed. Now Obama being somewhat against that particular method has decided not to capture these ole boys, and does not care whether they may or may not be U.S. citizens involved. He just calls in an airstrike from a drone, and just kills them in some other country. Now if that was done here in the USA it would be illegal. Oh… heck yes BO is at the head of the class as a constitutional scholar or is he teaching the class? LOL!!

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    Just a note, the president along with the head of DHS may very well be in violation of Law under 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a law which was enacted by the U.S. Congress. You cannot change the law or re-write the Immigration and Nationality Act without the approval of congress. This notion that Obama is an expert on immigration law is absurd.

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    Mike nice blog…
    But, however Obama at some point has to stop blaming Republicans and take responsibility for his own actions. I just don’t know how you can disagree with that argument, or anyone else for that matter. If he is re-elected who will he blame when things do not go his way? At some point someone has to be honest, so who will it be?

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    This comment was removed by the user.

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    Mike I for one, do not have a reading comprehension problem. Maybe facts are in order here, instead of blaming someone else for the actions of the dang president. Dang you must be kidding…

    Eric Holder the (AG) answers to the Dang President. (AG) “Sorry Mr. President I have bad news for you, your BUTT is in trouble some body lied about the Leaks.” Do you really think that is going to happen?

    Mike you wrote this blog, it is wide open for criticism. So, are you telling all of us, your readers, that Eric Holder has no responsibility in regards to a United States Border Patrol Agent being killed? And that Fast and Furious has no consequence to his responsibility?

    What do you base this statement on?
    “I'm more than positive that President Obama never ordered his security staff to engage in an unlawful manner, but there was a breach somewhere at some high level of trust.” Dang bold statement… I will say that objectivity sure as heck went out the window on this blog.

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    What does Bush have to do with this?

    Who does Eric Holder answer to?

    Why did you leave out the Democrats on this issue of leaks?

    Did you not see the bi-partisan criticism of these leaks?

    Who in the heck are you blaming, the Republicans?

    It does appear the president did not declassify any of this information that was leaked. I would venture to say the president has a damn serious problem on his hands. This goes a heck of a lot deeper than politics. We do not need Eric Holder investigating anything or his people, until he can explain why in the hell a United States Border Patrol Agent was killed at the hands the ATF.

    Flag this comment

  • itisi 

    Sugar,

    Nice blog… If you can find this book, try “The Shepherd of the Hills” the copyright is 1907, by Harold Bell Wright. It would be right up your ally of entertaining books.

    Flag this comment

Previous