Comments


  • Gary, what is your obsession with sex? I think you need to repent and wash yourself in the waters of the Lord. Your mind is filled with perverse thoughts and rages with lust. REPENT SINNER!!!

    May 28, 2010 at 8:40 a.m.

  • Dear Sir

    The Bible says let every seed bring forth of its own kind. When horses mate we get another horse etc etc.
    There is natural evoulution where one type of horse may naturaly flourish in a perticular environement but it doesnt eventualy turn into something else.

    Now there is a pattern of sequince that God used in creating ,starting with basic sea life, then graduating on up to man kind.
    Where is the missing link that has bafled scientest for centuries?

    The link between ape & man. The answer is again found in the Bible. Gen, there was an up right beast called the serpent, this beast was the most beutifull & smartest creature. He seduced Eve & was cursed to his belly as a snake forever. The closest dna to man is the snake, it is still associated with sex acts today. There is the missing link. These things are hiden from the wise (so called)

    Thanks Gary White

    May 27, 2010 at 11:40 p.m.

  • ...there is none so blind than he who will not see...

    ...open the eyes of my heart, Lord...

    February 1, 2010 at 11:29 a.m.

  • After all, just like there is a lunatic fringe that denies evolution, there is a lunatic fringe that denies the holocaust. Shouldn't we teach both theories?!? Where's your sense of academic freedom now, creationists?
    http://www.articlesbase.com/health-ar...

    February 1, 2010 at 6:30 a.m.

  • The "God could have made it that way" arguement does not hold up in the science classroom!

    February 1, 2010 at 12:47 a.m.

  • @ AltonEaston

    "Evolutionary Theory is a theory not proven fact. Creation Theory is a theory not proven fact."

    Gravity is just a theory too, but I'm pretty sure that you wouldn't argue that it is fact.

    January 30, 2010 at 7:53 p.m.

  • What? Careful when quoting scientists. Make no mistake, money for research drives this group. (news flash- the global warming scam) Money also drives religious groups. From the length of your post, you have some time on your hands. As a farmer working in what I call the "theater of God" I have to say that natural selection which may or may not be a subset of evolution, does occur. However, you use theories of men that have never observed nature other than in a lab or office setting trying and prove evolution. Quote a real scientist like Jefferson. One has to get a little dirty, muddy, and work with the land and nature to truly understand evolution vs. creation. The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.

    January 30, 2010 at 12:46 a.m.

  • Evolutionary Theory is a theory not proven fact. Creation Theory is a theory not proven fact.

    From reading your blog, I see a lot of facts related to observations on the earth. I also see some misstatements. Creation Theory is not limited to the Judeo-Christian Bible, numerous religions believe in a creator/the source that established organized order.
    What I fail to see is a case that someone that believes in Creation cannot also believe in Evolution. I also, have never seen in Evolutionary Theory proof that a creator did not set the rules/scientific logic for evolution.

    January 30, 2010 at 12:15 a.m.

  • (quotation marks)

    January 22, 2010 at 9:03 p.m.

  • That's why I put the word in parenthesis.

    January 22, 2010 at 6:37 p.m.

  • Rebecca,

    It just seems to me if you really did not have an opinion on this subject you would not use the word "secular" in parenthesis. Hot button evangelical words like secular just automatically carry an implied opinion with them.

    January 22, 2010 at 6:10 p.m.

  • I don't have an opinion either way but I do have some creation science texts in our library and the table of contents isn't that different from a "secular" science text book. But, it's been a few years since I compared them side by side. If some high schoolers are using a creation based science program to clep out of college courses I assume that the texts aren't that different when it gets down to the facts. What do you think? I'm curious. Anyone have a "secular" physical science text, biology, or chemistry text so we can compare table of contents? I know most people would be bored with stuff like that but - I'm weird - and curious. =D

    January 22, 2010 at 5:27 p.m.

  • Wonderful, Marvelous, Savior, King of kings and Lord of lords, Redeemer, Friend, Word, are just a few of the names of the One who created this world and the science that goes with it. That's my opinion. Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

    If one day I find out that I was wrong, I still have been blessed with a great life and family. If I'm right in my faith, eternity with the Creator will make this life look pale in comparision. Now for you sir ....

    January 22, 2010 at 3:17 p.m.

  • You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. That's sad, really, really sad.

    January 21, 2010 at 7:57 a.m.