Of course the Iowa Caucuses matter... unless the winner is challenging the morally- and logically-bankrupt status quo. We're told that a Ron Paul victory in Iowa would somehow invalidate the results, and we'd only need to pay attention to 2nd & 3rd place. Mitt Romney recently said Paul doesn't "represent the mainstream", and he's correct. But the "mainstream" IS THE PROBLEM!! Romney is the problem! Anyone advocating we only make slight corrections in our collision course with economic insolvency & imperialistic demise IS the problem.
So, I consider it a Badge of Honor that I support a candidate that's debased & overlooked by the mainstream media, mainstream candidates, and mainstream America. The mainstream is the manifestation of our tyranny of the majority. However, I have hope that dissension will become popular in the mainstream and an awakening will occur before it's too late.
What a difference four years makes...
Additional Reading:
• Iowans Want Real Change
• Preemptive Strikes on a Ron Paul Win in Iowa
Print- •
- •
-
1 Comment
- •
-
Flag
-
Thank you for your contribution.Flag this as inappropriate

- Close
-
- •
Follow BSspotter

Comments
You do realize it is not that great of predictor in the REPUBLICAN side? Not to worry, if Paul loses Iowa there will be never ending conspiracy theories...even though an initial count is done at precinct before undisclosed location where campaigns can be as well....but the Paulbots., like their candidate, suffers from paranoia. Hey, if Paul loses, maybe he will endorse a candidate like in 2008. The confederate loving Chuck Baldwin? Socialist loving Ralph Nader? What about Cynthia McKinney? They may not be running, but apparently they fit who Ron Paul looks for as president (at least in 2008). Can imagine the workplace in Paul administration...where sexual harassment can reign free!
December 31, 2011 at 11:42 a.m.