Comments


  • Polygraphs are scientifically based and have research to back up their validity. However, they are not reliable for large groups of people who are naturally anxious, are practiced liars, or sociopaths.

    July 20, 2009 at 9:17 a.m.

  • Read ever word, even backed up a few times to make sure I did not misread something. I never even knew sure a thing existed.
    Thanks for the learning experience.

    July 13, 2009 at 11:03 p.m.

  • #1. As some folk would say, "Ya done good Leslie." #2. Her story might get that super sleuth a new source of business, paranoid parents requesting sniffs of the backseats of their teenager's cars.
    #3. The story is another example of unscrupulous LE using any evidence, true or not, to "solve" a case. An instructor at the Wyoming Law Enforcement Academy stated, "The only thing worse than a cop killer, is a killer cop." The same applies to implicating and/or prosecuting innocent people, even though you may not actually throw the switch on the electric chair, you've basically "killed" their life to some extent.

    July 13, 2009 at 4:20 p.m.

  • Polygraphs should not be accepted as evidence either. Its pure pseudo-science. Where is the DNA evidence? That seems like it would settle the case rather quickly.

    July 12, 2009 at 3:04 p.m.

  • I did post this morning but it disappeared..

    July 12, 2009 at 2:06 p.m.

  • She did a great job....

    July 12, 2009 at 2:03 p.m.