Ben Zeller

Victoria County Judge Ben Zeller

Victoria County Judge Ben Zeller called the Victoria Advocate “fake news” after the newspaper reported the court decided against a forensic audit to review its handling of Hurricane Harvey recovery spending.

The commissioners voted 4-1 at last week’s meeting to proceed with a standard financial audit conducted by a certified public accounting firm, despite repeated calls for a more in-depth, forensic audit by Commissioner Gary Burns and members of the public, that would examine the county’s procedures, policies and actions taken after the storm.

In a post Thursday on Facebook, Zeller wrote that the Advocate’s headline, which said the commissioners rejected calls for a forensic audit, was “blatantly false.” In a phone call Friday, he defended his stance, saying the word “forensic” wasn’t used correctly during the meeting.

Zeller said there have been numerous suggestions to the court about what needs to be reviewed, and the court’s vote to pursue an audit to examine the financials related to Harvey insurance money with the purpose of finding financial crimes “was, by definition, a forensic audit.”

“Whether or not the word ‘forensic’ was used in our motion doesn’t matter, because this financial audit is a forensic audit,” he said. “It’s clear that many people don’t understand the definition of the word and have been using it incorrectly.”

County judge criticizes Advocate coverage

But the discussion during the Feb. 3 meeting centered on two different audits: one done by a certified accounting firm that will review the county’s finances with the purpose of finding financial crimes, and one that was consistently called a “forensic audit” that would examine the county’s procedures, policies and actions taken after Harvey.

Burns explained that he voted nay because the motion was made for a financial audit, not the in-depth, forensic audit he was advocating for. He said a financial audit will “review invoices and checks,” but won’t look into what needs to be examined.

“Forensic auditors are trained to look beyond the numbers and look at the business reality of the situation,” he said. “That’s why I voted no, because the vote was for a financial audit; it was not for this forensic audit.”

Doug Cash, a senior manager of fraud and forensic advisory services with Eide Bailly, and Diane Terrell, an audit partner with the same regional certified public accounting and business advisory firm, said Friday that there are clear distinctions between a financial and forensic audit.

“Basically, a financial audit is looking at financial assets and liabilities of the entity you are auditing and ensuring they are reported in accordance with the correct set of standards,” said Terrell, who said she has been conducting financial audits for almost 30 years. “But it does not look at controls to the extent a forensic audit would do.”

A forensic audit on the other hand, Cash explained, often has a subset called an internal control evaluation. Cash described a scenario during which he conducted an internal control evaluation in a Colorado town. During that , he said, “we looked at every single department of their city, looked at their policies and procedures, interviewed people, looked at how things moved through the system and then made recommendations.”

“We ended up doing over 70 in-depth interviews to be able to get that,” Cash added.

Further, Terrell said a financial audit doesn’t look at the “whys, policies and procedures” in place behind the finances.

“Sometimes you’ll give a financial auditor five boxes of documents and they’ll sample it; that’s their job,” Cash added. “You give those same five boxes to a forensic auditor, and they’ll look front and back at every single document in all five of the boxes and more.”

David Holt, a certified public accountant and certified fraud examiner based in Seguin, echoed Cash’s understanding.

“Generally, getting an opinion on financial statements with a financial audit is overall big picture stuff,” he said. “But when you get into forensic auditing, it gets very pointed and specific toward people, money, and improper use of money and procedures and actions.”

Sean Kennedy, Victoria County’s treasurer, said during the Feb. 3 meeting that he agreed with Burns that the audit should be done by a firm that offers more than what a certified public accounting firm does because he and the county auditor already have checks and balances in place to review the county’s finances. He said bringing in a certified public accounting firm to look at the finances would be “a very short audit.”

“If you truly want to look for something, you need to bring in somebody that’s going to look at the construction manager and the work that was done,” Kennedy said at the time. “That’s where there might be some fraud.”

Burns on Friday defended the Advocate’s coverage of the meeting, saying it was clear that he and Kennedy differentiated clearly between the forensic audit and the financial audit that was ultimately voted on.

“I think the paper was accurate,” he said. “I challenge anybody to find anything in this whole series of stories that isn’t true.”

During their meeting on Monday, commissioners are scheduled to determine the procurement method for the audit, now labeled on their agenda as a “forensic audit.”

Cash said when considering a financial audit versus a forensic audit that at the end of the day, “information is power.”

“And the more information you have, the better,” he said. “Questions are answered, and I can say that the only way you’re going to get all the answers is to look at everything.”

Morgan Theophil covers local government for the Victoria Advocate. She can be reached at 361-580-6511, mtheophil@vicad.com or on Twitter.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
1
0
0
0
1

(8) comments

Willie Ellis

America is misguided by politicians and civic leaders who hide behind the phrase “FAKE NEWS” a term rooted in the NAZI German campaign of “Lügenpresse.”

LEONARD SADDLER

What do we call making a policy to act as a guideline? Is that fake policy?

Doug Hazlewood

If you don't have facts or honesty on your side, just resort to 'fake news' as your response? You have shown your true stripes. Do what you were elected to do.

Grace Butler

Wow. Zeller is starting to look more and more like an idiot, isn't he?

George Schwarz Staff
George Schwarz

Well, Judge Zeller, if I have ever wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, that ship has sailed. First, using a term like Putin’s asset Trump makes you a Trumper in my eyes. That means you are aligned with the scum of the Earth. Second, resisting an in-depth look at the county finances means you’re afraid that some serious irregularities will turn up — and you know it. It also raises questions about Joyce Dean and how she handled things with the county.

I think we need to know how our tax money is being spent. And you need to know some of us are watching. Closely. I am particularly concerned about the airport, at least based on all that fake news in the Victoria Advocate.

Brian Vandale

It's time to start voting out, the judge and a few commissioners. Why would they not want a forensic audit, it seems like that's what people want. Maybe they don't want anyone to dig deeper and find out there's some corruption. IMO

Glenn Wilson

The longer Zeller and his cohorts stonewall and play word games the less they appear to have been merely incompetent in the gross mishandling of the post-Harvey airport repairs. What, exactly, are you working so hard to keep concealed, Judge?!

It all depends on the meaning of “forensic?” Come on, get her done and put this behind us. Fun and games are over.

Welcome to the discussion.

Transparency. Your full name is required.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article. And receive photos, videos of what you see.
Don’t be a troll. Don’t be a troll. Don’t post inflammatory or off-topic messages, or personal attacks.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.

To subscribe, click here. Already a subscriber? Click here.