City of Victoria officials need to open their eyes to the role they can play in the affordable housing crisis plaguing our community.

This is by no means a simple problem that anyone should expect government alone to fix. But city leaders can take the lead in, first, acknowledging the problem exists and, next, accepting they have a job to do in addressing it.

One simple, key step the city needs to take immediately is to form a quasi-governmental committee to work with nonprofit and business leaders to identify ways to boost housing that people can afford. This is a move that would cost zero tax dollars but would provide some of the leadership needed to address the city’s critical housing shortage.

The need ought to be painfully apparent to anyone looking at what’s “Hidden in Plain Sight” –the title of this newspaper’s ongoing special series about economic inequality intensified by Hurricane Harvey. About half of the community’s renters spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing. The 30 percent figure is a widely accepted percentage for a household to be financially stable.

When households are financially vulnerable, whether to hurricanes or medical catastrophes, the community suffers greatly. For example, one of the first expenses people cut is health insurance. Along with leaving families vulnerable, the lack of health insurance hits Victoria County taxpayers hard. Last year, the county-owned Citizens Medical Center saw its charity care costs soar 33 percent.

Many other compelling fiscal arguments abound. Prevention is much cheaper than law enforcement and other public costs incurred when families and individuals suffer. For example, a commission in Central Florida estimated that the region spends $31,000 a year per homeless person because of the costs of law enforcement, jail stays, hospitalization and emergency room visits. By comparison, it costs $10,000 to put that same person experiencing homelessness into a house and give him or her a caseworker.

Some City Council members have argued the government has no place in providing housing. This is highly selective reasoning. The same council members have no qualms about spending millions of dollars to build a new road – Placido Benavides Drive – because they think it will spur retail sales. Since it was founded in 1982, the public-private partnership known as the Victoria Economic Development Corp. has received up to several hundred thousands of tax dollars each year because the city and county hope this investment will generate new jobs.

During the past decade, council members have spent about $1 million supporting the Texas Zoo because they think the educational and entertainment opportunities it provides are important to Victoria’s quality of life. Shortly before Hurricane Harvey hit, council members also decided to take on the operation of the financially struggling Riverside Golf Course because this is considered an essential city amenity. Another significant public expense each year is the annual street party known as Bootfest.

The list of choices for spending goes on and on. All of the items listed above come with strong arguments supporting the public investment. Not one is stronger than the argument for a city investing in the basic need of adequate shelter for its residents.

The good news is many of the steps the city can take don’t have to cost money. For one, the city could examine ways to boost the number of affordable rental units by removing barriers to construction, such as offering incentives for development through density bonuses, tax abatements or fee waivers. The Washington Area Housing Partnership is one of many examples of a public-private partnership promoting affordable housing. The city, county and the Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission should study the toolkit offered by the Washington partnership and look around the country for other best practices.

Considered creatively, this effort could coincide with other city priorities, such as revitalizing downtown. Affordable housing doesn’t have to mean only subsidized or big apartment buildings. Instead, the city could offer incentives for the development of duplexes, triplexes or fourplexes in existing single-family neighborhoods such as downtown, where experts agree a higher population density is needed to support more businesses there.

To get started, the city needs to understand that thoughtful and reasonable governmental policies are a hand up, not a handout, to those in need. The middle class is the backbone of every community, and Victoria’s working class is being strained beyond its limits. If the city doesn’t act soon and smartly, the crisis will only deepen.

If that happens, what’s hidden in plain sight will become impossible to ignore.

Recommended For You

This opinion reflects the views of the Victoria Advocate’s editorial board.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.

(5) comments

Glenn Wilson

"Affordable Housing" must be a code-phrase for housing that's affordable to folks with no resources or income. When I check housing prices around the country on, a real estate website, it's clear that Victoria, TX, is a bargain, especially considering the amenities available here to those who care to get of the house and partake.

AdvocateEditorialBoard Staff

Thank you for reading and commenting. If you have the means to buy, the situation is much better, although availability of lower-priced homes is limited. The situation is much, much worse for renters because price has outpaced income for many years. Harvey worsened this situation because it seriously damaged or closed a third of all rental units. Those are starting to come back online but at even higher prices.

Glenn Wilson

If price has outpaced income for many years, then who’s buying the houses? The answer is those who have sufficient income and resources. For them there is no “affordable housing crisis”. For people with little or no income or resources there’s no such thing as affordable housing on their own. It requires some kind of assistance. Victoria, being a county seat, has a large population of the latter, especially as Harvey pushed so many people over the economic edge. When City Council focuses on economic development instead of funding housing for the disadvantaged they’re helping to create jobs which provides the income to buy housing which is far superior to hand-outs.

AdvocateEditorialBoard Staff
Victoria Advocate Editorial Board

Our editorial board opinion makes the point that local government can focus on economic development, as it has, and adopt policies that promote affordable housing without providing a handout. Some of these policies and approaches are listed above. Thank you for the conversation.

Brian Vandale

The city could give exemptions, but the housing still wouldn't be cheaper. It's called GREED and that's the problem. The city officials don't really care about the people in my opinion. They only care about themselves, they would rather waste monies than use it wisely.

Welcome to the discussion.

Transparency. Your full name is required.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article. And receive photos, videos of what you see.
Don’t be a troll. Don’t be a troll. Don’t post inflammatory or off-topic messages, or personal attacks.

Thank you for reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.

To subscribe, click here. Already a subscriber? Click here.