Editorial

When politicians stonewall, the public needs to pay even closer attention and demand action.

What’s the motivation for official inaction? Too often, it’s to get the public to forget and move on to other matters of the day.

More than six weeks ago, Victoria Regional Airport commissioner Dennis Patillo called for the formation of a forensic task force to review the spending of Hurricane Harvey rebuilding money. Patillo and others want to know whether the county mismanaged the multimillion-dollar recovery project.

An independent task force would try to answer this central question and the many other related ones that have arisen. A task force would be a step toward restoring the public’s trust that has been damaged by this controversy.

Victoria Regional Airport Officers' Club

The space in the back of the newly renovated Officers’ Club at the Victoria Regional Airport is meant to be a kitchenette but has not been completed. Some airport commissioners have criticized spending $400,000 to renovate the building, which they say should have been razed so money could be spent on essential operations.

Unfortunately, the county commissioners aren’t moving forward. During a joint meeting with the airport commission July 15, county commissioners agreed to appoint an independent task force. Yet, September has arrived with no sign of any progress.

County commissioner Kevin Janak reports only that his small group continues to “reinvent the wheel” as it reviews the incomplete Harvey paperwork that he says came to his attention in early March, shortly after the director of administrative services, Joyce Dean, retired.

Janak has offered no timetable for when this review would be completed. When it comes to tracking millions of dollars of work performed by the county, public officials must be firmly in control of the wheel before the first penny is spent.

Since the concerns first surfaced, the Advocate’s reporting has revealed even more troubling questions about the Harvey project:

  • Why did the county suspend state bidding laws required for projects of $50,000 or more? Commissioners took this vote even after their insurance carrier told them the emergency phase of the project had ended and the county could resume normal business practices.
  • Why did the county not contact Gerloff Company after its insurance carrier recommended the well-known San Antonio company? The carrier, the Texas Association of Counties, suggested both Gerloff and the much lesser-known Virtus Group of Olathe, Kan., in an email to the county Aug. 25, 2017.
  • Why can’t the county produce a detailed list showing the damages it sustained from Harvey, the specific repair work done, the corresponding amount paid and the repairs yet to be done? 
  • Why were all the invoices for the work performed rubber-stamped by the county’s treasurer and auditor’s office, as officials from both departments have told the Advocate occurred?

The questions keep multiplying. At this point, Janak’s internal group will never be able to fully satisfy the public. Only a truly independent review will be able to repair the damage done and point the way toward meaningful reform and transparency.

Should the Texas Rangers investigate Victoria County's spending of Hurricane Harvey recovery money?

You voted:

Because county commissioners are unwilling to move forward, it is time for concerned citizens to call for the Texas Rangers to step in. The state created the Rangers’ Public Corruption Unit and Public Integrity Unit for the purpose of holding government accountable to the people.

A Rangers’ investigation doesn’t mean a crime has been committed. Rather, it means a trained outside and independent investigator will try to get the answers to these important public questions.

A Rangers investigation completed in 2013 revealed internal county management problems that never would have come to light otherwise. County commissioners failed to act on that Rangers report then, but this time the public is watching.

No matter how much the county stonewalls, the public must keep watching and demanding accountability. Public integrity is at stake.

This opinion reflects the views of the Victoria Advocate’s editorial board.

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.
1
0
0
0
0

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Rick Collie

It’s very clear now that an independent investigation is necessary. Janak and his team can never regain the loss of public trust. They can only wait for it to blow over.

Glenn Wilson

They must be planning to run for Congress. They certainly have all the right moves.

George Schwarz Staff
George Schwarz

This editorial is a touch too gentle for my taste. It's clear that the entire process requires a forensic investigation. Joyce Dean, in particular, needs to be put under oath in the proper public venue.

Glenn Wilson

[thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Transparency. Your full name is required.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article. And receive photos, videos of what you see.
Don’t be a troll. Don’t be a troll. Don’t post inflammatory or off-topic messages, or personal attacks.

Thank you for Reading!

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to read or post comments.

To subscribe, click here. Already a subscriber? Click here.